calumdown
Well-Known Member
ALLWED?I found myself reading this going ,…
Hmmm, yeah, I see, uhuh! Ok, I know where your going, Ye, I see!
And concluding wit, no I disagree with your theory.
You are calling it a blanket title of science. It’s what we call it, but there were fundamental truths about how things work long before us and they’ll still be there long after we’re gone. I think we agree on that.
How we interpret those truths may be man made but for example, the laws of physics are what they are no matter what we call them and whether we’ve proved them and interpreted them for our fellow man or not.
I think I understand your theory fully and I get what you are saying but I draw different conclusions than you from the evidence you present.
Science is regularly like that. Scientists formulate theories. They are peer reviewed. The evidence is examined and proof is tested. Faith doesn’t come into it. Which is in reply to a previous remark I made to one of your other theories.
In short Calum, I think I agree with you about so much but reach slightly different conclusions from the same evidence.
THAT’S ALLWED.
Sorry. Couldn’t resist. Who new? Im a shouter. Well if the CAP fits.
sounds like a scandanavian pagan, mate.