mammutly said:bluealf said:mammutly said:bluealf said:What we want is kiddie fiddling ***** and rapists off the streets forever so they wont re-offend like they always do and destroy another young life.
Is that so hard to understand ?
Give an absolute definition of "kiddie fiddling ***** and rapists". If you are going to kill people, you need to be certain that it's absolutely clear and unambiguous. No grey areas allowed.
Go on then. Think as if it's you doing the executing. You have to be sure, so let's hear it.
What ???????????
How could you even try to turn my sentence around ?
Well lets put it this way, some body rapes my daughter or fiddles with my son's, i will take a big fucking weapon and there will be no court case needed.
But if they are not mine and do go to court as is the case for LETS say for arguments sake baby p's step dad the killer and then low and behold a baby rapist also ??????????????
What is there to defend ?
Certainly not a concurrant sentance, A fucking joke mate.
Once you move away from the extremes? Plenty.
According to your original premise a 17 yr old lad who has sex with his 15 yr girlfriend should be executed. No trial necessary.
If it was my 15 year old daughter yes.
But now i have joked with you, dont take the piss we both know what kind of fiddlers we are talking about and if you want to defend them fine.
i find that just a bit sick myself.
Btw my wife was raped for 14 years by her ex, please continue your splendid defence of the sick cunts.
ps i have spent time in the police cells for retribution before you ask.