It's one or the other I thinkI really rated Rice but this season his performances have been lacking. I think he’s disenchanted at WH and it’s showing. Why City would want him when you have Kalvin Phillips is beyond me.
He is their version of Joey Barton in the days under Stewart Pearce, bang average player that stands out in a sea of sh1t.I've never understood the hype around this guy, he's the definition of average.
John Stones much better passer of the ball.Declan Rice would be fantastic in the current John Stones role.
Declan Rice is also v good on the ballJohn Stones much better passer of the ball.
There is a reason John Stones plays the John Stones role
Yeah but Stones is better.Declan Rice is also v good on the ball