2019[edit]
According to a March 2019 analysis by
Northeastern University's School of Journalism, Sanders received the most positive coverage of any major candidate in the 2020 Democratic primary. An updated analysis in April after more candidates had entered the field placed him third out of eight candidates;
[14] a further update for June to September 2019 found that Sanders's positive coverage ranked fourth out of eight major candidates.
[15]
In April 2019, Sanders wrote to the board of the
Center for American Progress in response to a video produced by their former media outlet
ThinkProgress. The video mocked him for becoming a millionaire after writing a book about his 2016 election run.
[33][34] The article based on the video was later emended to remove references about Sanders' physical appearance.
[35] The following month,
Politico published a feature article on Sanders's income which described him as "rich" and "cheap".
[36] Politico was criticized by the
Anti-Defamation League.
[37]
In August 2019, Sanders said that
The Washington Post did not "write particularly good articles" about him and suggested that it was because he frequently mentioned that
Amazon,
The Washington Post's parent company, did not pay taxes.
[38] Marty Baron, executive editor of
The Washington Post, responded, "Contrary to the conspiracy theory the senator seems to favor,
Jeff Bezos allows our newsroom to operate with full independence, as our reporters and editors can attest."
[38]
In November 2019, Emma Specter at
Vogue doubted that there was a conspiracy against Sanders. She also listed several examples of limited coverage of his policy proposals and interpreted lack of coverage of Sanders on certain issues and events as being "only
somewhat surprising".
[39]
In a December 2019 opinion column for
The New York Times,
David Leonhardt agreed with
Politico co-founder
John F. Harris about the media having a
centrist bias. Leonardt argued that this hurt Sanders and Warren, particularly in questions posed to both about the issue of a
wealth tax.
[40]
2020[edit]
The
CNN-sponsored debate between Democratic candidates on January 14, 2020, was the subject of criticism over perceived bias against Sanders, especially concerning moderator
Abby Phillip's handling of a he-said, she-said controversy between Sanders and fellow Senator and candidate Elizabeth Warren.
[41][42][43] Journalism think-tank
Poynter Institute called Phillip's treatment of Sanders "stunning in its ineptness and stunning in its unprofessionalism".
[44]
In February 2020 media appearances and interviews, against a backdrop of Sanders' ascendance in the
polls, campaign consultant
James Carville expressed his displeasure at the prospect of Sanders being nominated, branded Sanders as a "communist," and pejoratively labeled Sanders' base of support as a "cult," and warned of the "end of days," if Sanders were to win the
Democratic nomination.
[45][46]
MSNBC came under particular scrutiny during the first three primary-season state votes due to historical references made by two of their hosts.
Chris Matthews compared Sanders to
George McGovern in terms of electability on February 3 and criticized Sanders for adopting the "democratic socialist" label on February 7.
[47][48] His February 7 remarks stated that a stronger influence by Sanders and other left-wing politicians who were active during the
Cold War could have resulted in "executions in Central Park".
[49][50] The following week,
Chuck Todd criticized the rhetoric of Sanders supporters by quoting a
conservative article which compared them to
brown shirts in the Nazi regime.
[51][52]
Commenting on the
2020 Nevada Democratic caucuses, Matthews invoked
"the fall of France" to the Nazis in 1940 as a metaphor for Sanders' apparent victory in the state.
[53] His analogy was criticized by the Sanders campaign and other commentators, who noted that members of Sanders’ family had been murdered in
the Holocaust. Matthews later issued an on-air apology to Sanders and his supporters.
[54]
Sanders suspended his campaign on April 8, 2020.
[55]