Him and his agent point blank rejecting any offer which makes economical sense for City is taking the piss. £3m or £10m hmm if they want the move that badly they should ask Gala to pay a bit more money!Why is it 'having the piss taken out of us' ?
He cost us nothing, we did pretty much nothing for him whilst he was here, he has been paid wages by other clubs for most of his City career, we talked him into signing a five year deal by promising him first team football then sent him back out on loan, & now, we could get a small transfer fee for him.
Exactly which part of that, is him 'taking the piss' out of us ? Surely it's the other way around ?
Exactly. City do not owe him any favours regardless of the fact that we pissed him off. Just like he doesn't owe us any favours. We can easily keep him if the price is not good for us, just like he can refuse any offer that is no good for him.Him and his agent point blank rejecting any offer which makes economical sense for City is taking the piss. £3m or £10m hmm if they want the move that badly they should ask Gala to pay a bit more money!
city the business can not just refuse, we have to what is best for our youth regardless that is the core of our youth business without it we would not attract the best players, city have to be seen as fair , just let him go for a pittance with a huge sell on percentage then we can take the moral high groundExactly. City do not owe him any favours regardless of the fact that we pissed him off. Just like he doesn't owe us any favours. We can easily keep him if the price is not good for us, just like he can refuse any offer that is no good for him.
Think you're wrong about how the home grown bit works.Contract till 2020.
We want get rid and are holding shite cards.
Let him be happy in Instanbul.
Should have been off years ago but got a contract hoping for some profit.
Not the best bit of business but sometimes it simply doesn't work.
At least now we know foreign loans don't add to the home-grown rule.