Diane Abbott

Lucky13 said:
Rascal said:
metalblue said:
The NHS is paid for by taxpayers but do let me know when this country starts giving tax bills based on use of services and voting preferences....I suspect the NHS budget will be a fraction of what it currently is when that day arrives but I guess you'll be happy as no right wingers will be using it.

You and Lucky13 miss my point.

A labour MP pays for a child to go to a private school also pays tax towards the education system. But by sending the child to a fee paying school they become morally bankrupt.

A conservative MP votes for free market reforms of the NHS yet still uses the service instead of doing what they believe in and purchasing private healthcare. That is also morally bankrupt.

I have stated on here I would abolish all fee paying schools and i would also abolish all private healthcare. If we are trully all in this together as we are told, the morally correct thing to do is have the same level playing field for all.

You would stop people from spending money on whatever they wanted , where would you stop?

On education and healthcare yes i would. The state provide it already so there is no need for private provision. Why duplicate resources. People dont advocate spending there money on private armies as the state provide one.
 
Rascal said:
Lucky13 said:
Rascal said:
You and Lucky13 miss my point.

A labour MP pays for a child to go to a private school also pays tax towards the education system. But by sending the child to a fee paying school they become morally bankrupt.

A conservative MP votes for free market reforms of the NHS yet still uses the service instead of doing what they believe in and purchasing private healthcare. That is also morally bankrupt.

I have stated on here I would abolish all fee paying schools and i would also abolish all private healthcare. If we are trully all in this together as we are told, the morally correct thing to do is have the same level playing field for all.

You would stop people from spending money on whatever they wanted , where would you stop?

On education and healthcare yes i would. The state provide it already so there is no need for private provision. Why duplicate resources. People dont advocate spending there money on private armies as the state provide one.

You trust the state to provide anything , you sound like a totalitarian national socialist.
 
Lucky13 said:
Rascal said:
Lucky13 said:
You would stop people from spending money on whatever they wanted , where would you stop?

On education and healthcare yes i would. The state provide it already so there is no need for private provision. Why duplicate resources. People dont advocate spending there money on private armies as the state provide one.

You trust the state to provide anything , you sound like a totalitarian national socialist.

I am to the far left yes, although i have mellowed with age and i do see the merit in some limited form of capitalism.

National socialism was Hitlers mantra and suprisingly his socialist policies rebult Germany into a major power, his nationalist policies destroyed him. Hitler would have hated me as his dislike for the far left was only trumped by his dislike of the jews.
 
Rascal said:
Lucky13 said:
Rascal said:
On education and healthcare yes i would. The state provide it already so there is no need for private provision. Why duplicate resources. People dont advocate spending there money on private armies as the state provide one.

You trust the state to provide anything , you sound like a totalitarian national socialist.

I am to the far left yes, although i have mellowed with age and i do see the merit in some limited form of capitalism.

National socialism was Hitlers mantra and suprisingly his socialist policies rebult Germany into a major power, his nationalist policies destroyed him. Hitler would have hated me as his dislike for the far left was only trumped by his dislike of the jews.

Sickle and hammer or swastika same flag. i think your more right wing than you think i'd never restrict peoples choice on what they could spend their money on.
 
Racist woman. Hypocritical woman. Thick woman. Asks questions that have nothing to do with the topic. Answers questions that havent been asksed. Gormless twonk . . . basically a fucking thick Tony Blair woman. I hate her.
 
Andy Dale said:
Racist woman. Hypocritical woman. Thick woman. Asks questions that have nothing to do with the topic. Answers questions that havent been asksed. Gormless twonk . . . basically a fucking thick Tony Blair woman. I hate her.

Yep. Disgrace that puts race relations back generations with her inept playing of the "race card" at every opportunity. The irony being that if she was white she may well have not got where she is today as people would have not been too scared to point out all of the above. Waste of oxygen (and a fair amount of calories too).
 
Currently playing the victim again on Sky news.

I have zero respect for her im afraid and she does more harm for race relations and womens rights than she ever does good.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.