Dianne Abbott

[kaz7]

How about this?

Well do you?

 

[DrBlueBob]

Mate, you sound like you are off your tits - stay safe and have a good night.

It does rather doesn't it?
Less than one can of lager though. I think I just had a moment. :-)

 

[Vic]

Just waiting for @Len Rum to come on to say “what about Priti Patel??”

Why wait for Len?

 

[Ban-jani]

Where is everyone taking the piss out of tories for not wearing masks,mixed measures on masks and generally being cunts

Len has literally been attacking Patel on this thread when it’s not about her, literally every Tory thread is full of people attacking them for everything (some of it very much justified).

It’s the nature of politics in 2020 and Bluemoon is more anti Tory than anti Labour.

 

[Ban-jani]

Why wait for Len?

No comment on the fact he was too or are you sexist?

 

[Vic]

No comment on the fact he was too or are you sexist?

Isn't his point that Patel seems as mathematically challenged as Abbott did in that interview? But Patel is actually in government. People who couldn't vote for Labour because of Abbott happily voted a bunch of liars who turn out to be not just gaffe-prone but utterly incompetent, and in Patel's case, promoting an immigration policy that, if it had been policy 60 years ago, would have meant we'd never have heard of her.

Home Secretary Priti Patel admits own parents might not have been allowed into UK under her new immigration laws

Minister insisted that changes were 'not about my background or my parents'

www.independent.co.uk

If someone is mad enough to revive a thread about Diane Abbott, they must have known which way it might go.

 

[bluethrunthru]

If someone is mad enough to revive a thread about Diane Abbott, they must have known which way it might go.

Its all they have got mate - they have seen the great white hope become the great white fridge hider and the Brexit party of Tories completely fuck up time after time - and the Uber hard Brexit they crave they now realise holds no positives for a long long time if ever so its attack Abbott over a mask or another favourite over the last few days is " it would have been worse under Corbyn". However when challenged they have zero evidence for that but it settles their stomach just to type it

 

[Ban-jani]

Isn't his point that Patel seems as mathematically challenged as Abbott did in that interview? But Patel is actually in government. People who couldn't vote for Labour because of Abbott happily voted a bunch of liars who turn out to be not just gaffe-prone but utterly incompetent, and in Patel's case, promoting an immigration policy that, if it had been policy 60 years ago, would have meant we'd never have heard of her.

Home Secretary Priti Patel admits own parents might not have been allowed into UK under her new immigration laws

Minister insisted that changes were 'not about my background or my parents'

www.independent.co.uk

If someone is mad enough to revive a thread about Diane Abbott, they must have known which way it might go.

The interview wasn’t as bad and whilst Patel needs to be more polished, she’s not a fraction as bad as Abbott, in fact I’ve never seen a politician as bad as Abbott.

Patel is doing ok as Home Secretary and has now learned to just say she doesn’t know if she doesn’t have the figures, as the Covid-19 process proved when she hadn’t been given them by SAGE.

I think thats a fair comment, we do need to desperately reduce immigration numbers and her points system is brilliant.

Admitting that her parents benefitted from the old way but we now need to tighten things due to numbers is fine by me.

 

[Vic]

The interview wasn’t as bad and whilst Patel needs to be more polished, she’s not a fraction as bad as Abbott, in fact I’ve never seen a politician as bad as Abbott.

Patel is doing ok as Home Secretary and has now learned to just say she doesn’t know if she doesn’t have the figures, as the Covid-19 process proved when she hadn’t been given them by SAGE.

I think thats a fair comment, we do need to desperately reduce immigration numbers and her points system is brilliant.

Admitting that her parents benefitted from the old way but we now need to tighten things due to numbers is fine by me.

Well, if you insist on prolonging this nonsense, Abbott got her sums badly wrong in an interview but Patel couldn't even read a big number out loud. "Through the government's ongoing monitoring and testing programme, as of 9am today there have been: 300,000; 34; 974,000 tests carried out". Not forgetting "cracking down on counter-terrorism". But it's not the gaffes, it's the corruption in her case.

 

[Ban-jani]

Well, if you insist on prolonging this nonsense, Abbott got her sums badly wrong in an interview but Patel couldn't even read a big number out loud. "Through the government's ongoing monitoring and testing programme, as of 9am today there have been: 300,000; 34; 974,000 tests carried out". Not forgetting "cracking down on counter-terrorism". But it's not the gaffes, it's the corruption in her case.

You keep saying corruption without any evidence, where is it?

There’s a difference between having a brain fart when reading some figures and trying to make them up because you do not have them, and getting them badly badly wrong whilst doing so.

Neither is great to be honest but Patel as Home Sec doesn’t keep me up at night, Abbott would do, she can’t even put the right fucking shoes on and think Mao should be celebrated.

Patel has made a couple of cock ups reading something through nerves, which she should do better on but she’s no Abbott.