BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,269
BillyShears said:BobKowalski said:My views on Pellegrini though are separate from the Mancini issue. If we had employed Benitez as coach or Ancellotti then the "promoted two levels above his station". and "His achievements no better than Hughes' at Blackburn" would not exist. That Pellegrini is not as good a coach as the two I mentioned or, to keep it factual, any where near as successful is in my view fairly self evident. One good second half performance is hardly going to alter my opinion.
It's also fairly self evident that Pellegrini is head and shoulders a better coach than Hodgson or Hughes. It's also fairly self evident that Hughes has never taken a team anywhere near a CL semi final whereas Pellegrini's taken two teams there in recent history. Benitez has trophies but has managed much bigger clubs for much longer than Pellegrini has. Both Valencia and Liverpool dwarf clubs like Villareal and Malaga.
As for the "promoted two levels above his station" - it's funny that you'd say that with all the clubs who wanted Pellegrini this summer. I'd love to know having overachieved so dramatically at Malaga and Villareal what you think the right level up would've been.
Two off the top of my head. Malaga and Villarreal. Oh OK Swansea as well.
And the managing 'bigger clubs' argument doesn't cut it. Coaches who win trophies start winning when they are not with bigger clubs. Its invariably how they get the job with bigger clubs. Its the same argument I would level at Moyes who when it mattered in terms of winning a trophy bottled it. Its not so much about who is the better coach or man management its about having the balls when it matters. I don't think Moyes has them and I don't think Pellers has either. But then I don't think F&T were looking for 'balls' when they drew up the job description.
#GoP