Discuss Pellegrini....

Status
Not open for further replies.
taconinja said:
OB1 said:
BillyShears said:
Forgive me for speaking for OB1 - I think his point is that irrespective of what the perceived weaknesses were in the team selected - it was still a team which was more than capable of beating Watford comfortably. The fact they didn't and the manager had to make substitutions doesn't automatically mean that the original team selection was wrong. Just that the players didn't perform to anything approaching the standard required.

Nothing to forgive ;-)

Let me add that Richards not suiting how we want to play is not a view a that I subscribe to to any great extent. Richards may ultimately come up short and has been overtaken by Zab but before his injuries, he was helping City concede the fewest goals and getting forward and creating chances for his team mates, he started our title winning season with a host of assists. He should be capable of doing a decent job for us against a Championship side.
I have no great argument with the idea that the players should have shown more determination in the first half.

Your second point, however, is what I meant about past performances. Two years ago, he played well. That's no way to determine if he will play well now. So far, he's been positionally inept and making incredibly incorrect runs forward in relation to his midfield partner. Can that be corrected? Of course, but Richards often seems much more willing to complain about being asked to do something not 100% in his comfort zone than he does attempting to alter his style of play.

Don't want to turn this into a thread about Micah - we have one of those already - but the lad has barely played for 18 months and the best way for Pellegrini to assess a player is in competitive match play so starting him against a team from the bottom half of the Championship is not an unreasonable move; especially given that it is a fact that he was a key part of a title winning defence when he was last consistently fit.
 
taconinja said:
I feel this is where our real summer work has to occur encompassing both the academy and transfers. If it's a starter we're looking for, perhaps CB to partner Kompany, but it's that second tier which needs strengthening.

I wonder what the perception of Rekik is. We keep being linked with Mangala, who's also left footed. I would expect Rekik back here, and I don't see us having three left footers in the squad. In an ideal world I'd like to see us go and sign another world class right footer, and let Rekik and Nastasic fight for the left sided CB position.
 
BillyShears said:
taconinja said:
I feel this is where our real summer work has to occur encompassing both the academy and transfers. If it's a starter we're looking for, perhaps CB to partner Kompany, but it's that second tier which needs strengthening.

I wonder what the perception of Rekik is. We keep being linked with Mangala, who's also left footed. I would expect Rekik back here, and I don't see us having three left footers in the squad. In an ideal world I'd like to see us go and sign another world class right footer, and let Rekik and Nastasic fight for the left sided CB position.
The manner in which we play seems to often include one central midfielder dropping in line with the two center backs while the fullbacks move forward or drop deep depending on which side the ball is at the time with a lot of shifting laterally for the center backs. I'm not sure Pellegrini cares as much for which foot our central defenders prefer as much whether they're comfortable playing on the left or right side of the pitch. That's conjecture though as I'm not really in a position to ask him.
 
de niro said:
wayne71 said:
BillyShears said:
Forgive me for speaking for OB1 - I think his point is that irrespective of what the perceived weaknesses were in the team selected - it was still a team which was more than capable of beating Watford comfortably. The fact they didn't and the manager had to make substitutions doesn't automatically mean that the original team selection was wrong. Just that the players didn't perform to anything approaching the standard required.

So when we perform poorly these days its no longer the managers fault?

are you joking? if this season goes tits up it'll be the shit players bob left him with. a bit like wee davy over the road.

Two piss poor posts that just aren't required on the thread. If both of you can't contribute then maybe stay out of the thread?
 
taconinja said:
BillyShears said:
taconinja said:
Your second point, however, is what I meant about past performances. Two years ago, he played well. That's no way to determine if he will play well now. So far, he's been positionally inept and making incredibly incorrect runs forward in relation to his midfield partner. Can that be corrected? Of course, but Richards often seems much more willing to complain about being asked to do something not 100% in his comfort zone than he does attempting to alter his style of play.

I just don't think Micah's progressed enough as a footballer in the last three or four years. In many respects our more disciplined style of football under Mancini allowed Micah's weaknesses to be better protected, but we've seen a few times this season that he isn't smart enough to play the way Pellegrini wants us to.

It's a stark contrast to Zaba. Someone who had as many weaknesses as Micah when he first came to the club, but has improved enormously in the ensuing years.

I can see OB's point though - ultimately the manager has to rotate his players when we have so many competitions to play in. It may well be that Pellegrini knows certain players probably aren't good enough, particularly when playing together, but the others need their rest.

The way I see it, had we lost yesterday, there'd be justified cause for complaint. However the fact that we didn't, and managed to get away with playing a lot of squad players, should be seen as good management.

For the record, I thought Pellegrini's decision to play Kun and Negredo on Wednesday was an aberration, compounded by Negredo's subsequent injury. Proper dropped bollock.
I feel this is where our real summer work has to occur encompassing both the academy and transfers. If it's a starter we're looking for, perhaps CB to partner Kompany, but it's that second tier which needs strengthening.

The second tier, quality wise, is the envy of most clubs and as stated is packed with international players. The problem is these players are not playing regular football and so it impacts on their form and their ability to reach the desired standard having not played for a number of weeks.

The likes of Clichy, Nastasic, Lescott or the Kolorov, Kolo Toure of last season. No players highlights this more than Pable Zabaleta. In our championship winning side them majority of City fans were more than happy with Micah Richards, now since his injury swapping the two is inconceivable.
 
Rammy Blue said:
de niro said:
wayne71 said:
So when we perform poorly these days its no longer the managers fault?

are you joking? if this season goes tits up it'll be the shit players bob left him with. a bit like wee davy over the road.

Two piss poor posts that just aren't required on the thread. If both of you can't contribute then maybe stay out of the thread?

The Modfather is untouchable.
 
franksinatra said:
The second tier, quality wise, is the envy of most clubs and as stated is packed with international players. The problem is these players are not playing regular football and so it impacts on their form and their ability to reach the desired standard having not played for a number of weeks.

You need players capable of coming in and making a difference from the off. If there are players in the squad who can't perform from the bench, but aren't good enough to start, then they should be moved on.

I do think there's been a lot of unfair criticism of our squad players in general. I think the manager's rotated players really well and everyone in the squad has played plenty of games. When you consider the fact we're still in all competitions, then even if the performances the squad players put in aren't as aesthetically pleasing as the ones our best team put in, they are still bloody effective.
 
Rammy Blue said:
de niro said:
wayne71 said:
So when we perform poorly these days its no longer the managers fault?

are you joking? if this season goes tits up it'll be the shit players bob left him with. a bit like wee davy over the road.

Two piss poor posts that just aren't required on the thread. If both of you can't contribute then maybe stay out of the thread?

Its very relevant, when we played shit under Mancini it was because Mancini was a shit manager, when we play shit under Pellers its the players fault apparently. I just want to know what the squirming clowns think, if thats ok.
 
blueinsa said:
Rammy Blue said:
de niro said:
are you joking? if this season goes tits up it'll be the shit players bob left him with. a bit like wee davy over the road.

Two piss poor posts that just aren't required on the thread. If both of you can't contribute then maybe stay out of the thread?

The Modfather is untouchable.

just the truth mate, if we win owt it'll be down to pellers, if we win jack shit it'll be bobs fault. you know the score.
 
Pellers is doing exactly what he was emplyed to do and he is doing it very well.

Players will lose form and have bad games like we all do, people neeed to understand that but it is possible to critique MP without being having a Mancini agenda. City play 4 4 2 personally i am not as condifent as many others whom think will win the prem but realistically that is what MP was emplyed to play and if we do or dont i dont see that as his fault.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.