OB1
Well-Known Member
taconinja said:I have no great argument with the idea that the players should have shown more determination in the first half.OB1 said:BillyShears said:Forgive me for speaking for OB1 - I think his point is that irrespective of what the perceived weaknesses were in the team selected - it was still a team which was more than capable of beating Watford comfortably. The fact they didn't and the manager had to make substitutions doesn't automatically mean that the original team selection was wrong. Just that the players didn't perform to anything approaching the standard required.
Nothing to forgive ;-)
Let me add that Richards not suiting how we want to play is not a view a that I subscribe to to any great extent. Richards may ultimately come up short and has been overtaken by Zab but before his injuries, he was helping City concede the fewest goals and getting forward and creating chances for his team mates, he started our title winning season with a host of assists. He should be capable of doing a decent job for us against a Championship side.
Your second point, however, is what I meant about past performances. Two years ago, he played well. That's no way to determine if he will play well now. So far, he's been positionally inept and making incredibly incorrect runs forward in relation to his midfield partner. Can that be corrected? Of course, but Richards often seems much more willing to complain about being asked to do something not 100% in his comfort zone than he does attempting to alter his style of play.
Don't want to turn this into a thread about Micah - we have one of those already - but the lad has barely played for 18 months and the best way for Pellegrini to assess a player is in competitive match play so starting him against a team from the bottom half of the Championship is not an unreasonable move; especially given that it is a fact that he was a key part of a title winning defence when he was last consistently fit.