As many have said the way City are set up off the field and with some of the best talent on it, any half decent coach should be able to win a league every other year. That is indeed what has happened. Neither Mancini nor Pellegrini are up there with the great managers. Mancini did a good job of getting the club to believe. His aggressive personality got under the skin of his managerial rivals. He changed the psyche of the club. No mean feat in my view. He also took about five minutes to organize the defence which had been so porous under Hughes. But he had his limitations in terms of the creative side of the game and like Mourinho his abrasive style has a wear and tear factor on a club's staff.
Pellegrini came in and changed the bad atmosphere releasing the players from a tactical straitjacket. However it is debatable whether we have improved since then despite further spending. His seeming lack of interest in setting up the team to face what is in front of us is a deep flaw.
This team will not be remembered as a great premier league team. Exciting often, brilliant at times, but strangely passive on occasions. We have had the players. Kun, Yaya, Silva and Vincent are up there with Vieira, Henry, Vidic, Zola, Gerrard and Lampard. And the fact that they have been ably assisted by the likes of Hart, Zabaleta, Dzeko, Milner, Clichy, Fernandinho and Tevez suggests to me that we in danger of underperforming.
We have won two leagues on the last day of the season. We need to be winning a few like United, Chelsea and Arsenal have done in the past. Easily. Then this group of players will rightfully take their place alongside the Arsenal Invincibles. For me that wouldn't have happened had Mancini stayed and it's not going to happen with Pellegrini at the helm.