bondsman said:
Damocles said:
Because Liverpool and United won 20-30 years ago and football has changed as a business drastically since then.
When you had managers that built squads whose job was always around for 5-10 years then you can have the old model. When you have the average life of a manager at 5-10 months you can't.
That's a flawed argument though. Why follow a trend because it's a trend? Ferguson and Wenger weren't 20 - 30 years ago either. Plus importantly what it takes to win football matches isn't a director of football and never will be imo
It's not a trend. It's a complete change to how football businesses are run and has been adopted by almost every club in every country in the known footballing world.
This is like suggesting that we should ride a horse and these cars things are just a trend. Even most English clubs including City have used a DoF model for years. We won the title in 11/12 with a DoF. Chelsea have a DoF. So do Barca, both Madrids, Bayern, Dortmund, both Milans, basically everybody in the world.
Ferguson always had a DoF in Bobby Charlton though he was less hands on than the modern roles. Wenger grew up in a time before they were popular and has resisted one and look what he's done over the past 10 years - nothing for a club the size of Arsenal.
Nobody is suggesting that to win football matches you need a DoF. The suggestion is to consistently win football matches over many years you need a DoF now because giving managers carte blanche over transfers when the average appointment only lasts a year or so waste hundreds and hundreds of millions of pounds, and gets you pretty much nowhere. Also that the modern manager role has grown too big for them to be fucking about negotiating transfer fees and the like with other people or sit negotiating contracts with agents.