Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
Your last bit is so true. Tickles me when i hear “£200k a week for kicking a bag of wind about”.United fans can't even get the Glazers out of Old Toilet despite breaking the law on several occasions.
The Superleague was unpopular with the Establishment, including Johnson's government, which saw another chance to gain easy popularity. (I doubt Johnson really gives a shit whether football lives or dies or changes to 15 a side.)
Going against the Establishment is a very different matter, and some very rich men have grown very much richer since the PL was formed. Unless fans are willing literally to boycott the game entirely - which they aren't - any changes we influence will be quite minimal.
We pay the players what we do because otherwise, they would bog off to another league. It may look like stupid money - it is - but theirs is a very rare skill. Pretty much all of us have kicked a ball at some point, but I guess maybe 1% are up to playing at a decent level and maybe there are 0.1% who are good enough to play for this iteration of City. There's a reason why Kevin de Bruyne plays for us, and not for Real Madrid on the one hand or Prestwich Heys on the other. It's not that he was born on Claremont Road or spent his boyhood on the Kippax. We make it worth his while. He could play for any side in the world if he wanted. We give him a package that suits him and (presumably) he's happy at City. Cut his wage and it's a pound to a pinch of shit he would walk. If only because someone else would offer more.
I played at a standard that was probs a level below being paid. Very good amateur standard.
That next level up, semi pro, even the lower reaches of semi pro, was a humongous leap. And so on.
I played with a lad who had played prem football, he was 40 at this point and it was like playing with pele. He was light years ahead of us in every way
So when people question their salaries, they have a talent that a minuscule amount of people on earth have.
Just like well paid actors and pop stars.