I think it depends which religion, which denomination of such religion and where mostly.
It wouldn’t be fair to compare an Anglican in England to a evangelical in the Bible Belt of the US.
Nor would it be fair to compare an astronomer in Tehran or Baghdad, to a rural villager in the desert of Saudi Arabia.
Science wouldn’t where it was today without believers, such as Newton and those in ancient Baghdad pioneering mathematics.
A good mantra for us to coexist by is.. the atheists don’t have a monopoly on science and the religious don’t on morality.
Whereas, if you believe in something - whatever it is - absolutely - due to conviction - without regard to evidence to the contrary - however persuasive - than I cannot persuade you - no matter what.
Whereas, I believe in scientific fact - I'm 100% open to persuasion.
===
That said, the existence of God or not is unprovable by science - should you choose to believe in God - I cannot dissuade you on the evidence.
===
>>>I think it depends which religion, which denomination of such religion and where mostly. It wouldn’t be fair to compare an Anglican in England to a evangelical in the Bible Belt of the US.
It's all a matter of degree IMO.
Some religions/sects are extremist anti-science - some less so.
It's rare - to find someone who both believes in God and in accepted 21st century science. I personally know of no one such; probably such persons are 1-in-10 in the USA or less.
Believers in God seem to think that they are on earth for a special purpose; or that they can communicate with God; or that, for example, quantum science can't be real as it seems to contradict some sort of God-fordaned reality - a friend of mine similarly doesn't believe in black holes because he can't believe that a human sucked into a black hole would be lost "forever" (actually he wouldn't due to black hole evaporation but whatever) - and so forth.