bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Management scum
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Do you support the RMT?
- Thread starter Rascal
- Start date
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,886
- Team supported
- City
Management scum
It says something when Ian Dale is starting to wake up to how the British workforce is being treated.
He does have a soft side and is more centre, like Keith.
Management scum
Why would anyone be shocked that managers get bonuses for improving productivity by sacking workers? It's just capitalism.
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,886
- Team supported
- City
A weird concept that doesn’t bring anything to the country. In fact, it costs.Why would anyone be shocked that managers get bonuses for improving productivity by sacking workers? It's just capitalism.
Boss cuts 2 jobs, saving 60 grand, the pays himself an extra 30. Who pays more into the country?
A weird concept that doesn’t bring anything to the country. In fact, it costs.
Boss cuts 2 jobs, saving 60 grand, the pays himself an extra 30. Who pays more into the country?
You sound American.
Zubrman
Well-Known Member
Playing Devil's Advocate here but if the two sacked workers were on £30K each, they would have paid £3.5K income tax each. That's £7k.A weird concept that doesn’t bring anything to the country. In fact, it costs.
Boss cuts 2 jobs, saving 60 grand, the pays himself an extra 30. Who pays more into the country?
If the unscrupulous boss were to get a £30K payrise, that would be £12K more tax (at 40%.) If he/she/they/it earned over £150K then it is taxed at 45% and therefore be £13.5K to HMRC.
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,886
- Team supported
- City
Playing the devils advocate is one thing, the reality of that person offsetting their tax to some haven means that we would get very little. And who does those 2 jobs?Playing Devil's Advocate here but if the two sacked workers were on £30K each, they would have paid £3.5K income tax each. That's £7k.
If the unscrupulous boss were to get a £30K payrise, that would be £12K more tax (at 40%.) If he/she/they/it earned over £150K then it is taxed at 45% and therefore be £13.5K to HMRC.
Blue Maverick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 21,897
What about the indirect tax, the two workers would spend more of their money on the economy than the boss I reckon.Playing Devil's Advocate here but if the two sacked workers were on £30K each, they would have paid £3.5K income tax each. That's £7k.
If the unscrupulous boss were to get a £30K payrise, that would be £12K more tax (at 40%.) If he/she/they/it earned over £150K then it is taxed at 45% and therefore be £13.5K to HMRC.
Zubrman
Well-Known Member
Aye. Most probably.What about the indirect tax, the two workers would spend more of their money on the economy than the boss I reckon.