cucumberman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
I do. I don't want to endanger others by watching tv without a license.
I do. I don't want to endanger others by watching tv without a license.
I detest income tax why should I pay it,I'm sure if I didn't bother somebody else would cover it.Again, it's your choice to pay the licence fee.
As it stands I don't have a choice, I'm forced to pay for something I detest.
The programmes you mention could and would still be made without the BBC.
They are made by independent production companies and would find a platform elsewhere.
Do you seriously think British TV compares favourably with American TV.
I can't imagine a British TV company, let alone the BBC, making The Sopranos, The Wire, Breaking Bad, Elementary etc.
I detest income tax why should I pay it,I'm sure if I didn't bother somebody else would cover it.
This has been done to death on here. BBC five live is worth the licence fee alone, imo.
Here's the thing with the BBC; the people on the right think it's biased towards the left. The people on the left think it's biased towards the right. That says to me it does a pretty fucking good job of trying to find a balance.
Long term, the licence fee will be rolled into council tax so it will get paid, one way or another
I detest income tax why should I pay it,I'm sure if I didn't bother somebody else would cover it.
Silly.
Even BBC insiders acknowledge that the corporation is left of centre and to progress you need to buy into that left wing agenda.
Long term the licence fee will be abolished because it is no longer relevant.
They could, but then they would be more at the mercy of commercial pressures were they to be made for commercial channels: they'd take less creative risks and stick to lowest-common-denominator populism; and they would certainly have content cut if the advertisers didn't like it (look at South Park's weekly battles with Comedy Central execs who are under pressure from corporates). Is it a coincidence that all our best comedy is on BBC and Chanel 4, whereas the stuff on ITV is atrocious? No, because ITV can't take those creative risks when they have to appease advertisers with ratings.The programmes you mention could and would still be made without the BBC.
They are made by independent production companies and would find a platform elsewhere.
Yes, I do. What you've done is list the cream of the crop but ignored the 95% of American TV that is utterly awful. They churn out a lot, so law averages dictate that they would produce some quality. I think that the percentage ratio of quality/terrible for the BBC is much better. And in America, when it comes to news, political and cultural programmes, all the best stuff is on PBSDo you seriously think British TV compares favourably with American TV.
I can't imagine a British TV company, let alone the BBC, making The Sopranos, The Wire, Breaking Bad, Elementary etc.
I think it was tongue in cheek.Very silly post this.
You should pay income tax because that's the way you contribute to the society you live in; and if you don't pay you'll probably be locked up.
They compare very well, because American TV is craaaazy expensive. Most of the programs you list are HBO, which you have to pay a large fee on top of the already large fee you pay. They are huge budget programs made with the extortionate amounts they charge.Again, it's your choice to pay the licence fee.
As it stands I don't have a choice, I'm forced to pay for something I detest.
The programmes you mention could and would still be made without the BBC.
They are made by independent production companies and would find a platform elsewhere.
Do you seriously think British TV compares favourably with American TV.
I can't imagine a British TV company, let alone the BBC, making The Sopranos, The Wire, Breaking Bad, Elementary etc.
I think it was tongue in cheek.