Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Personally an IQ test with a minimum pass mark of 100 (mean average) would be a good start. Then we wouldn't have half the votes cast by people below mean average intelligence.

They wouldn't need to register with me, I'm sure a panel could be set up. I'm rather busy as it is.

To answer your question seriously, no, perhaps we can't ban idiots and people with ghastly views from voting and this is the problem with democracy. As Churchill said "the best argument against democracy is a conversation with the average voter".

Ps, if racists or homophobes aren't a problem for you then have a good evening and I'd rather not bother conversing with you going forward.

My problem is with people trying to decide who should vote and who shouldn't. Smacks of facism to me.
Try using a cohesive argument. Course if that's a problem for you just block me
 
What do you expect? "Hitler invades Poland" - now, Herr Goebbels, for the record (or rather the Daily Mail), can you give us a bit of balance?
I wasn't aware that Trump had already invaded another sovreign nation, and all before his inauguration.

What right does the publicly funded BBC have to hold a corporate opinion on this election and, worse, for it to infest its editorial output to such an extent?
 
She'll be too busy calling everyone racist and sexist for disagreeing with her. Why anyone even gives her the time of day is beyond me

To be fair, Trump went after the votes of the racist and sexist quite unapologetically.

I don't get how we've got in a situation where someone calling people out on their bigotry is somehow worse than someone being a bigot?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.