TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 26,220
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Some batshit republican on MSNBC claiming Kennedy stole the election from Nixon and the Dems are going to do it to Trump.
Batshit Republican?Some batshit republican on MSNBC claiming Kennedy stole the election from Nixon and the Dems are going to do it to Trump.
Some batshit republican …
along with a good many respected American historians, to be fair, if you look at what happened to some of the votes in Illinois.Some batshit republican on MSNBC claiming Kennedy stole the election from Nixon
Cheer, mate.Click on it. It's 165 pages to prove his criminal acts were done as a candidate not as president, so not immune. But it puts all the evidence straight into the public domain without a trial.
It's impossible to call. Trump's odds have been a bit short from day 1. Most evidence points yo a Harris win. But polls have been all over the shop the last few years. And Republicans still have time to meddle and ramp up interference.According to the odds though there is nothing to separate them.
Haha! Thought it was a bit punchy!It's not a judgment. It's evidence.
Chutkan will hold a trial within a trial to decide whether the indictment is valid or whether the acts evidenced are covered by immunity. It is for the judge to decide whether to hear oral argument (probably yes) and on what points. I would expect a decision in favour of the prosecution. After that, I expect Trump to appeal, arguing that he has immunity. Anticipate it finishing in POTUS with looney tunes Maga judges. This will run and run. Trump may die before a trial begins. Two years of argument? What a system but @Dax777 tells us it is a minor issue.So what next? The defence gets to argue that all those acts were official?