Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
Yup, saw that yesterday. It's hush money agreements that started all this off.
You can tell the intellectuals on here by their use of words like ‘sesquipedalian’.That was easy :)
Anyway, to my mind:
i) An intellectual, in this context, would be anyone who takes a position based entirely on rational argument rather than more basic and, dare I say, more human reasoning. You can make your own mind up to whom I am referring :)
ii) I didn't refer to intellectual voters, I referred to voters who weren't intellectuals and so who don't take a position based entirely on rational argument and who value more basic and, dare I say, more human reasoning.
iii) So, intellectualisation of an issue would be taking a position based entirely on rational argument rather than more basic and, dare I say, more human reasoning.
As you can see, imho, it's kind of a circular process.
I suppose I could try an example to see if it gets us anywhere, if anybody is interested in so doing. I'm not sure I am, honestly.
It takes one to know one.I think you are giving too much undeserved credit here. There is very little rational arguments being put forth here. Just mostly in group emotional vomits and self congratulatory postulations .repeated overtime that gives it the patina of reasoning.
Are there exceptions? Sure. But it's not the norm.
It’s the shibboleth for intellectuals on any forum, really.You can tell the intellectuals on here by their use of words like ‘sesquipedalian’.
I prefer the Socratic view, myself.Surely any idiot knows that depends on whether you take a Hegelian or Jungian view of the dialectic.
Absolute state of this thread.
Ha ha
The line about the two giraffes slayed me — ha ha ha.That made me laugh.
I prefer the Socratic view, myself.
Ha ha