Good move from City.
But hey, something is wrong. I'm not a lawyer but you don't need much knowledge to understand
it's strange that the same player gets a work permit at one club (with low wages) and not at another club (high wages).
For what reason exactly? What's the logic behind?
What about the fundamental aspect of equal treatment?
Is that even a kind of discrimination?
I hope Home Office will have to answer some good questions to develope a system that's making sense, for THIS one doesn't.
Bosman #2?
A year has passed, since we failed to get a work permit for him. City clearly thought we ourselves would have a better chance to get one this time under the 'exceptional talent' criteria, given his player of the tournament award and increased appearences in la liga, as reported that the club would try.
I myself didn't believe this might be enough, just like you, but, i can see the logic in it, and if the club were willing to try, they'd surely know more.
In addition, (domalino's post highlights this in more detail), the transfer fee value and wages offered come into the equation assessing this, and given Villa have a lower wage bill than us, his wages may well feature in a considerable percentage.
They wouldnt both be going into this if they didnt consider it likely. The whole thing might be conditional on his work permit being granted, so let's see how it pans out.
Not such good business if the buy back clause is £25 million.
thanks @domalinoGood move from City.
But hey, something is wrong. I'm not a lawyer but you don't need much knowledge to understand
it's strange that the same player gets a work permit at one club (with low wages) and not at another club (high wages).
For what reason exactly? What's the logic behind?
What about the fundamental aspect of equal treatment?
Is that even a kind of discrimination?
I hope Home Office will have to answer some good questions to develope a system that's making sense, for THIS one doesn't.
Bosman #2?