You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Douglas Luiz
- Thread starter mcfc482
- Start date
That's a rule that should have been challenged.Or put another way, a fucking made-up rule in "operation halt City " .
How can you be eligible to play for one team and not another in the same league?
I doubt the figure is correct as the sell on fee is always for the profit compared to the original fee rather than the new fee.
Says who?
Or put another way, a fucking made-up rule in "operation halt City " .
That's a rule that should have been challenged.
How can you be eligible to play for one team and not another in the same league?
You realise it is the Home Office that sets the rules, not the PL.
It is a points based system. The public effectively voted for it, when voting in the government at the time that implemented it.
One of the sets of points, is being in the top percentage of earners at his employers. At our club, with the players we have, he was never going to he amongst the top earners. At Villa, with the same wage, he was. That is why he qualified to.olay for them, but not for us.
But it us a ridiculous rule.One of the sets of points, is being in the top percentage of earners at his employers. At our club, with the players we have, he was never going to he amongst the top earners. At Villa, with the same wage, he was. That is why he qualified to.olay for them, but not for us.
He couldnt play for us but he could for Villa.
When he had signed for Villa, they could sell him to us.
FMwkdsoul
Well-Known Member
2 years later, matched far more criteriaBut it us a ridiculous rule.
He couldnt play for us but he could for Villa.
When he had signed for Villa, they could sell him to us.
When he still wouldn't be in our top earners2 years later
FMwkdsoul
Well-Known Member
matched far more criteria than just wage, 2nd time round.When he still wouldn't be in our top earners
wage, fee, experience in Europe, Importance etc
But it us a ridiculous rule.
He couldnt play for us but he could for Villa.
When he had signed for Villa, they could sell him to us.
It is not a rule. It is a qualification criteria. It has nothing to do with the league. Is it ridiculous? Arguable, but that's like arguing having diffeent speed limits in different areas is ridiculous.
And no, that's not how it works, they couldn't just sell him back to us. It applies for the duration of his work permit, or till his age triggers a different set of points.
I know that but a player should be entitled to play with any team within a leaguematched far more criteria than just wage, 2nd time round.
wage, fee, experience in Europe, Importance etc