Dzeko [Merged]

Re: Dzeko

pudge said:
balkanno said:
pudge said:
I think he was incredibly poor, simple as.

Quite a few players weren't at it at all either but he was particularly bad, and if you want to try and defend his performance then you're insane

nd anyones agrees. it s those "true" "symatist" on here who assume nd generalize ALL Bosnians would come nd defend dzekos perfomance, which is not true.

best example that didactid sad fella, saying something "balotelli fucks 10 times better than dzeko"

i dunno.

-- Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:14 pm --

city diehard said:
You don't get it do you, 4 goals in one game is brilliant but to score one goal in every 4 games is better. Don't you get that?

depends, first off balotelli didn t scored 4 times a row. that s everything you need to get here.
Balotelli has scored in 4 games in a row, infact he scored 5 goals in that period

i see..
 
Re: Dzeko

Jumanji said:
Bosno said:
larderland said:
this,dzeko hasnt scored in ages,was it wolves at home??one that was handed on a plate,4 in 1 game makes a huge dif,hes not good enuf,simple as

and tats coming from someone who was ecstatic when we bought him

he honestly looks and plays likes hes downed a bottle of wiskey before he plays bcos his touch and finishing is that of a drunk footballer

Hard to spread out score when after his good run of form, he's been given 5-10 minutes at the end of matches. Therefore, sicne he hasn't been given the chacne to spread out his scoring you can only look at stats and since you don't care about goals, maybe assists, and he has more than Aguero.
BOLLOCKS.

He never had a run of form. Ever. He scored 4 goals against A POOR POOR Spurs with a makeshift midfield that let us shit on them with absolutely no conviction.

One game, which will be the highlight of his fucking career here. Yes, he actually had a brilliant performance in ONE game, but sooner or later, he was bound to have a decent game....

5-10 minutes at the end of matches? Bollocks. And even if it were true (which its not), it just goes to show, he's not as good as our other two strikers.
Jesus, he scored in our first 5 competetive games this season. One in each and then 4 against Spurs.

Yes, he was terrible today but cmon you can't say he was like this all season.
 
Re: Dzeko

balkanno said:
pudge said:
JasminBosnia said:
What do you think about his performance today? easy question.

He had several shots on and off and one single extra cross from Silva. He sent a ball to a row Z twice and hit a woodwork. I would say he was not that poor like most of you think.
I think he was incredibly poor, simple as.

Quite a few players weren't at it at all either but he was particularly bad, and if you want to try and defend his performance then you're insane

nd anyones agrees. it s those "true" "symatist" on here who assume nd generalize ALL Bosnians would come nd defend dzekos perfomance, which is not true.

best example that didactid sad fella, saying something "balotelli fucks 10 times better than dzeko"

i dunno.

-- Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:14 pm --

city diehard said:
balkanno said:
4 goals in one game is bad, coz it shows you how really good he was.

You don't get it do you, 4 goals in one game is brilliant but to score one goal in every 4 games is better. Don't you get that?

depends, first off balotelli didn t scored 4 times a row. that s everything you need to get here.

You are showing yourself to be a right dunce, I was speaking hypothetically not giving a real world example. I think possibly your english is altering the expression of your argument.

*Pudge rightly informs this thread that Balotelli bettered this, just please stop defending the indefensible.
 
Re: Dzeko

city diehard said:
balkanno said:
pudge said:
I think he was incredibly poor, simple as.

Quite a few players weren't at it at all either but he was particularly bad, and if you want to try and defend his performance then you're insane

nd anyones agrees. it s those "true" "symatist" on here who assume nd generalize ALL Bosnians would come nd defend dzekos perfomance, which is not true.

best example that didactid sad fella, saying something "balotelli fucks 10 times better than dzeko"

i dunno.

-- Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:14 pm --

city diehard said:
You don't get it do you, 4 goals in one game is brilliant but to score one goal in every 4 games is better. Don't you get that?

depends, first off balotelli didn t scored 4 times a row. that s everything you need to get here.

You are showing yourself to be a right dunce, I was speaking hypothetically not giving a real world example. I think possibly your english is altering the expression of your argument.

My pleasure, out of context?
 
Re: Dzeko

lits simple really us city fans want edin to be good for us, it benefits us, we like the guy as well or at least i do, he puts in the effort imo, i have no reason whatsever to have a go at his performances unless i believe they are poor

some of you bosnian lot are so biased its pointless discussing it with you, you dont care about city you support edin i just dont understand why you are here
 
Re: Dzecko

jimharri said:
joezilla said:
it's certainly not a lack of skill or form, but rather a matter of mentality. he was just unlucky in the first half, but he completely cracked under pressure after missing few more opportunities. it all epitomized by him hesitating to contest the goalkeeper when one on one and deciding to try his luck from very unlikely to score situations. he definitely needs to get his stuff together when it comes to finishing. other than that, his selfless passing is still one of the best in the team and he will leave the last atom of breath on the pitch.
Any fool who is physically fit can run around the pitch like a headless chicken for 90 minutes. In itself, it is not an admirable trait. There has to be some end product. More often than not, there is no end product from Dzeko.
he still has like 9-10 goals in the premier league, doesn't he? you can't deny his skill and ability to score. something hasn't been working for dzeko, but something definitely hasn't been working for city lately. that thing isn't dzeko.
 
Re: Dzeko

balkanno said:
city diehard said:
balkanno said:
nd anyones agrees. it s those "true" "symatist" on here who assume nd generalize ALL Bosnians would come nd defend dzekos perfomance, which is not true.

best example that didactid sad fella, saying something "balotelli fucks 10 times better than dzeko"

i dunno.

-- Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:14 pm --



depends, first off balotelli didn t scored 4 times a row. that s everything you need to get here.

You are showing yourself to be a right dunce, I was speaking hypothetically not giving a real world example. I think possibly your english is altering the expression of your argument.

My pleasure, out of context?
...and your point is?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.