bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,118
Written by Sam Quimm.
Jumanji said:Are any of Chelsea's Belgians present?sotspo said:Then Belgian NT trained for the first time yesterday. Hazard was not yet present but Kompany was. He gave interviews to the Belgian media and stated about Hazard that he would not try to influence him but he would gladly give him advice on Manchester (city or the city? that was not stated) if asked.
Hazard will join the team today (I might go and watch their training) and will probably be asked questions by the media. We'll see more in the newspapers tomorrow.
Out of curiosity were they asked these questions as well?
Blue>Red said:wow, what an obscene statement, was going to give him grief but he doesnt deserve my effort of signing up to the sitesam-caddick said:Can you believe some pratt wrote this:
Should Hazard join City, he would immediately become the team's best player. I'm not so sure that role is the best thing for a 21-year-old kid in a new league.
Better than Kun, Tevez, Yaya, Silva, Kompany?? Obviously know f*** all!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...le-star-should-stay-away-from-manchester-city
sod off then and stop boring us with your depressing flapping. Please.bluebannana said:BoyBlue_1985 said:bluebannana said:http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/05/22/transfer-talk-and-gossip-hazard_n_1535067.html?ref=uk
pparently were pulling out because of Hazards ridiculous wage demands
if you believe the Huffington Post mate, i would give up on life ;)
its not just in there though it in the mirror, mail, guardian, they must be all true, getting sick of this transfer now
SWP's back said:sod off then and stop boring us with your depressing flapping. Please.bluebannana said:BoyBlue_1985 said:if you believe the Huffington Post mate, i would give up on life ;)
its not just in there though it in the mirror, mail, guardian, they must be all true, getting sick of this transfer now
oh ffsbobmcfc said:Manchester City's tradition is not as strong, but has currently built a very strong team, with players like Tévez, Agüero, Silva, Kompany and the Italian coach Roberto Mancini, a coach with strong records, a strong personality and who used to be as well a very fine technical player.
Chelsea is a combination of both, with stronger tradition than City, has won more prizes won, and remarkable names as Drogba, Čech, Lampard, Terry, etc... that are known to every fan, and have achieved the status of World Class as well.
Both last clubs can offer a much higher salary, but their future depend on the finances of their owners. What if Abramovich (Chelsea) or the Abu Dhabi United Group (Manchester City) to lower the priority of football and decide to stop spending money in the clubs? What if the Financial Fair Play sets in soon, and the clubs are not able to buy any player they want anymore to keep themselves in the top 3? Then it all comes back how well the clubs are led, and what the trainer can do to stay ahead.
The bit in bold has annoyed me abit. its on his official website (well i think its official if not then thank god) discussing that on an open forum takes the piss abit. maybe i'm being a little precious.