I think its quite sweet that we get the manager involved and I'm glad hes being included cos hes had a hell of a time. :)richards30 said:if bobby gets involved then hazard will be ours!!!
I think its quite sweet that we get the manager involved and I'm glad hes being included cos hes had a hell of a time. :)richards30 said:if bobby gets involved then hazard will be ours!!!
richards30 said:if bobby gets involved then hazard will be ours!!!
Stopping wumming you massive wum.johnmc said:Would Paddy Crerand know about the rags transfer business as he is tweeting he has signed for them for £38m
SWP's back said:oh ffsbobmcfc said:Manchester City's tradition is not as strong, but has currently built a very strong team, with players like Tévez, Agüero, Silva, Kompany and the Italian coach Roberto Mancini, a coach with strong records, a strong personality and who used to be as well a very fine technical player.
Chelsea is a combination of both, with stronger tradition than City, has won more prizes won, and remarkable names as Drogba, Čech, Lampard, Terry, etc... that are known to every fan, and have achieved the status of World Class as well.
Both last clubs can offer a much higher salary, but their future depend on the finances of their owners. What if Abramovich (Chelsea) or the Abu Dhabi United Group (Manchester City) to lower the priority of football and decide to stop spending money in the clubs? What if the Financial Fair Play sets in soon, and the clubs are not able to buy any player they want anymore to keep themselves in the top 3? Then it all comes back how well the clubs are led, and what the trainer can do to stay ahead.
The bit in bold has annoyed me abit. its on his official website (well i think its official if not then thank god) discussing that on an open forum takes the piss abit. maybe i'm being a little precious.
Vincent said:Where would Hazard even play ? I'd much rather have Nasri starting next season. He came into his own in the last 5/6 games.
How do you know all this?BibbyBlue85 said:richards30 said:if bobby gets involved then hazard will be ours!!!
He's already spoke with Bobby too when he was over for the Derby. It was Bobby that told Hazard his plans for him, the team and the club. I agree that if Bobby gets involved again then Hazard will be ours.
richards30 said:if bobby gets involved then hazard will be ours!!!
The cookie monster said:How do you know all this?BibbyBlue85 said:richards30 said:if bobby gets involved then hazard will be ours!!!
He's already spoke with Bobby too when he was over for the Derby. It was Bobby that told Hazard his plans for him, the team and the club. I agree that if Bobby gets involved again then Hazard will be ours.
The cookie monster said:How do you know all this?BibbyBlue85 said:richards30 said:if bobby gets involved then hazard will be ours!!!
He's already spoke with Bobby too when he was over for the Derby. It was Bobby that told Hazard his plans for him, the team and the club. I agree that if Bobby gets involved again then Hazard will be ours.
samharris said:The cookie monster said:How do you know all this?BibbyBlue85 said:He's already spoke with Bobby too when he was over for the Derby. It was Bobby that told Hazard his plans for him, the team and the club. I agree that if Bobby gets involved again then Hazard will be ours.
Fruit pastille bribe matey...works every time. ;)
Pastor Kidney said:richards30 said:if bobby gets involved then hazard will be ours!!!
Baconface could try his kidnapping trick again at the airport