Eden Hazard (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
citytill1die84 said:
goatinho said:
Fucking hell.
64 pages of shite about someone who may or not play for us.
If he does....great.....if he doesnt.....I'm really not arsed!!!!

Don't enter the topic then it's that simple.

Some people are a bit strange like that

"I dont care so much i will write something telling people"
 
the same thing that happened with us last week - every client linking their player after our glory - is happening to Chelsea now. Lucas Moura, excellent player, 40 mil? get real.
 
Don't know if this has already been posted. I saw this yesterday but not seen anything about it anywhere else
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.rnanutd.com/en/News-And-Features/Football-News/2012/May/manchester-united-seal-hazard-deal.aspx.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.rnanutd.com/en/News-And-Feat ... l.aspx.htm</a>
 
johnmc said:
TonyM said:
I don't think any journalist really knows what's going on and I doubt if City or anyone else is dragging it out on purpose. I just think the lad wants all the options on the table before making a choice.

(By the way with all the bullsh*t speculation, I'm surprised Arsenal have not been mentioned. This summer they need to spend and Hazard would fit in to their team perfectly. He's basically a more likely to succeed Arshavin. Plus signing a big name could convince VanPersie to stay. Arsenal aren't far off being real challengers - 3 maybe 4 key signings and their squad could be phenomenal - at least as good as United's)

I disagree about Arseanl, I think they are a million miles from being a serious contender. Not sure any defender other than Vermalen is good enough. They have Wilshere and Sagna who seem to be getting serious injuries time after time. Walcott blows hot and cold, AOC is unproven, RVP may be off and if not him and Podolski could be great, but rely too much on them for goals. No midfielder scores enough. People rave about the keeper as well but I'm unconvinced.

When you say 3 or 4 players, they would need tobe all in the £20-£30m bracket and we all know that wont happen.

They are an injury or sale to RVP and Vermalhen away from having a mid table squad - in fact I reckon Liverpool currently have a better squad

Funny how people see the same facts and interpret them so differently. To me and I may be wrong, they have enough money to spend say 100 million this summer. And I think they have a better squad than Liverpool. They have a tremendous reputation to be fair to them so getting players would be much easier than for most clubs. What is holding them back is their reluctance to spend and the message that sends to any potential signings. It's too much of a risk for any incoming player.

Players need to see Arsenal spending big to believe they are a force still but I think if they take the leap they can attract almost anyone.

But these are just my musings :-)
 
Metal Blue said:
Don't know if this has already been posted. I saw this yesterday but not seen anything about it anywhere else
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.rnanutd.com/en/News-And-Features/Football-News/2012/May/manchester-united-seal-hazard-deal.aspx.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.rnanutd.com/en/News-And-Feat ... l.aspx.htm</a>

I wonder if Paddy Crerand has anything to say
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.