Damocles said:Bollocks to that, I definitely want him. Seems like a great player from the small bit Ive seen and have no problem with his attitude.
Still confident hes ours.
Damocles said:Bollocks to that, I definitely want him. Seems like a great player from the small bit Ive seen and have no problem with his attitude.
Still confident hes ours.
mancityscot said:seriosuly dont want this guy. more trouble than he's worth. sounds like a right primadonna
the manager chooses where and when you play you little arse.
would prefer he didnt go to one of our rivals though
Rammyblues said:Come what may he ain't going to play the full 70 games whether it is for us or the rags. Baconface rotates his squad and so will Mancini. Furthermore it will also depend on whether or not he hits the ground running, if he is playing well he could well continue in the either team for sometime, if not he shouldnn't expect a starting berth. Rags found with DeGea he didn't hit the ground running and baconface dropped him for several games.
If it is to do with where he plays, IMO at City he will be given a free role similar to Silva as for the rags I don't believe they allow anyone to have that freedom.
He will make his choice, if it is the rags they will say he has signed because of who they are, if it for us he will only have come for the money and they were never in for him.
Finally although he is quite clearly a top talent I would hope that our major target is Martinez or Silva, that will improve our team far more than Hazard who I consider to be a cherry on top of the cake type signing.
Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot said:"I do not know when a decision will be made about my future club," he told the Belgian media after training with the national side.
"It will be between Manchester City, Manchester United and Chelsea."
"The final choice also depends on how much play that I would get and the position where I play."
"Not everyone can say that he can choose from these three clubs."