Thaksinssoldier
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 10,088
He seems very on the scale to me, brilliant but a ticking time bomb.
He has Asperger’s. It’s public knowledge and he doesn’t hide it.
He seems very on the scale to me, brilliant but a ticking time bomb.
They had freedom of speech.
Not freedom of consequence.
Two very different things.
A bit like everybody on Earth?They had freedom of speech.
Not freedom of consequence.
Two very different things.
Isn’t that what Twitter were already doing though?They had freedom of speech.
Not freedom of consequence.
Two very different things.
Nah, it’s just who you determine who the “wrong kind of people” are.When Twitter ban you for violating their terms and conditions, it's a threat to free speech.
When SpaceX fires you for condemning the behaviour of it's founder, it's a consequence of free speech.
Let's face it, the so called freedom of speech debate is just one of many on a conveyer belt of red herrings.
Nah, it’s just who you determine who the “wrong kind of people” are.
Or more simply put, the people with abhorrent views hate being silenced and shout free speech when challenged about their abhorrent views.
Is it possible to be a biased centrist?I wouldn't mind if they just owned their prejudices instead of unconvincingly dressing them up as unbiased centrism.
I've lost count of the amount of people who supposedly don't have an opinion either way on Musk, despite their rebuttals becoming more and more nonsensical every time a legitimate criticism gets added to the ever growing list.
Isn’t that what Twitter were already doing though?