Emergency keeper loan / Hart / Brum [All merged]

Rammy Blue said:
Farerets said:
Why is he a risk... Has he ever let anyone down? He was a Wrexham last year and conceded only two goals in 5-6 games. He has done well at City to be promoted to the bench. On his international debut, he was the main reason for Faroese first ever (!) victory over Iceland in their 20th attempt or so.

What has he done wrong that people are so reluctant against him??? No PL experience? Well, no goalkeeper has ever had PL experience at first place, without playing a game! And Gunnar now has that experience, playing against no else but Arsenal at Highbury!

Gunnar is a Man City goalie, let him play!!!!!!

Are you sure you're not a rag/spuds/villa fan?
He's already said earlier in the thread that he's not a City fan... he's a Gunnar Nielsen fan and supports whatever club he plays for. Can you tell!?

I think "Farerets" must also look like a Viking, and he's part of some "i look remarkably like a Viking" club or something.
 
Farerets said:
Damocles said:
There's already precedent, it's been done more than a few times.

Examples, please (at this stage of a season)?

Stage of the season doesn't matter, it's in the rules.

Ipswich have previously done this, as have Villa. I seem to remember United getting Goram on loan late on in the season too, but this may have been before the transfer window thing came into effect.
 
Brum fans r sound lads on that forum!

Mcleish can GET TO FUCK. At least were not hated by brum. Mcleish is just another bitter moyes because we thrashed them.

I think its unfair on gunnar though, we if we cant get hart/ or even if he cant train for a few days, play gunnar
 
Mancityfans.net'er said:
Brum fans r sound lads on that forum!

Mcleish can GET TO FUCK. At least were not hated by brum. Mcleish is just another bitter moyes because we thrashed them.

I think its unfair on gunnar though, we if we cant get hart/ or even if he cant train for a few days, play gunnar

What exactly is it that you think McLeish has done wrong?
 
Pigeonho said:
Mancityfans.net'er said:
Brum fans r sound lads on that forum!

Mcleish can GET TO FUCK. At least were not hated by brum. Mcleish is just another bitter moyes because we thrashed them.

I think its unfair on gunnar though, we if we cant get hart/ or even if he cant train for a few days, play gunnar

What exactly is it that you think McLeish has done wrong?

Just the negative/ stubborness of the interview. We have done his club a huge favour and he seemed to be saying ''city can fuck off we have an agreement for him to play the last 3 meaningless games for us''.

As for hart, I agree that if he has any ambition he should want to come back for the big games and get into the england squad. I dont like his love in with brum and his bitter comments this season. Is he another Robinho with his love for being a big fish in a smaller pond?
 
Farerets said:
chorleybloo123 said:
I know a lot of people like Gunnar, but he is a risk, and we can't afford to take an unnecessary risks at this point of the season.

Why is he a risk... Has he ever let anyone down? He was at Wrexham last year and conceded only two goals in 5-6 games. He has done well at City to be promoted to the bench. On his international debut, he was the main reason for Faroese first ever (!) victory over Iceland in their 20th attempt or so.

What has he done wrong that people are so reluctant against him??? No PL experience? Well, no goalkeeper has ever had PL experience at first place, without playing a game! And Gunnar now has that experience, playing against no else but Arsenal at Highbury!

Gunnar is a Man City goalie, let him play!!!!!!
Faretets you have been pushing for gunnar in goal all day today,so I have a question and please truth would be nice.

Are you Gunnar Nielsen?
 
Mancityfans.net'er said:
Pigeonho said:
What exactly is it that you think McLeish has done wrong?

Just the negative/ stubborness of the interview. We have done his club a huge favour and he seemed to be saying ''city can fuck off we have an agreement for him to play the last 3 meaningless games for us''.

As for hart, I agree that if he has any ambition he should want to come back for the big games and get into the england squad. I dont like his love in with brum and his bitter comments this season. Is he another Robinho with his love for being a big fish in a smaller pond?

No, Harts their player until the contract says so and as already posted a trillion times today, Birmingham have 4 places to lose, 4 places at a cost of £3m. He is doing nothing wrong.
 
Pigeonho said:
Mancityfans.net'er said:
Just the negative/ stubborness of the interview. We have done his club a huge favour and he seemed to be saying ''city can fuck off we have an agreement for him to play the last 3 meaningless games for us''.

As for hart, I agree that if he has any ambition he should want to come back for the big games and get into the england squad. I dont like his love in with brum and his bitter comments this season. Is he another Robinho with his love for being a big fish in a smaller pond?

No, Harts their player until the contract says so and as already posted a trillion times today, Birmingham have 4 places to lose, 4 places at a cost of £3m. He is doing nothing wrong.


And thats all down to hart is it? They can give us maik taylor then because he usually has a good game against us (maybe apart from when we hammered them)

I have never heard of any team being arsed about the prize money by the way. It makes me think of the time under SP or keegan when the team were really shit, out of the UEFA chase and it was a media excuse to tell the players we still had something to play for. As I recall it didnt work and the players didnt give a shit.<br /><br />-- Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:13 pm --<br /><br />I didnt say he has done anything wrong, but we did him a favour and he should be thanking us for that, not trying to sound like David Moyes. If I was him I wouldnt want to burn my relationship with city!!!
 
Mancityfans.net'er said:
Pigeonho said:
No, Harts their player until the contract says so and as already posted a trillion times today, Birmingham have 4 places to lose, 4 places at a cost of £3m. He is doing nothing wrong.


And thats all down to hart is it? They can give us maik taylor then because he usually has a good game against us (maybe apart from when we hammered them)

I have never heard of any team being arsed about the prize money by the way. It makes me think of the time under SP or keegan when the team were really shit, out of the UEFA chase and it was a media excuse to tell the players we still had something to play for. As I recall it didnt work and the players didnt give a shit.

£3m for Brum would have a say in their transfer budget next season. Ok they have a rich owner, but not on the same league as we do. Money is money, but when its millionS, well then its common sense to want it, not lose it. Letting our keeper go on loan all season was a gamble on our part, a gamble which more than likley looked to pay off cos it meant Hart getting experience and we were happy for that to happen as it ultimately only benefits us. That gamble also had the potential to fail though, like it is now and whilst long term we will still have the pay off of the gamble, right now we are suffering the effects of it failing, but as I say a gamble is a gamble and if it turns out to have some sort of fail, you have to suffer the consequences of it. Put it this way, if Given was ok would we be wanting Hart back? No, course not and the gamble would all be in our advantage, so just cos we need him back it shouldn't mean we can expect it just because the gamble appears to have some kind of negative efffect now.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.