Pigeonho said:happyblue. said:Hart not coming, prem won't allow it even though Brum were open to it. We've gone back in for Fulop.
I know no-one other than me sees it this way, but this is the way it should be. We can't pick, choose, then amend deals as and when it suits us. We wouldn't like it if we were in brums shoes, or Villa's or Spurs for that matter. Now maybe we can move on and concentrate on Neilson.
SWP's back said:Pigeonho said:I know no-one other than me sees it this way, but this is the way it should be. We can't pick, choose, then amend deals as and when it suits us. We wouldn't like it if we were in brums shoes, or Villa's or Spurs for that matter. Now maybe we can move on and concentrate on Neilson.
How can I say "fucking hell, you are really fucking boing me" without being personal?
Fucking contracts - always water tight, never been broken. Robbie stayed, Hughes wasn't sacked etc etc et fucking cetera.
WE ALL KNOW YOUR POINT - we know your feel;ings - let the fucker go.
Pigeonho said:Bellamy's Caddy said:Thanks for the update.
Gutted. We're allowed to bring in another keeper, but not the keeper we actually own, even when Birmingham have agreed to it? Has to be the most stupid decision ever. Does make you wonder at times if its just a conspiracy against us, rules and fastracking of decisions always seem to work against us. I wonder if it was the rags in this situation if the outcome would have been the same....Forward with Fulop I guess.
The PL are blocking us pulling out of a deal WE co-created. You can't do it mate, you simply cannot create deals and then want to renaign on it when it suits you.
Pigeonho said:Bellamy's Caddy said:Thanks for the update.
Gutted. We're allowed to bring in another keeper, but not the keeper we actually own, even when Birmingham have agreed to it? Has to be the most stupid decision ever. Does make you wonder at times if its just a conspiracy against us, rules and fastracking of decisions always seem to work against us. I wonder if it was the rags in this situation if the outcome would have been the same....Forward with Fulop I guess.
The PL are blocking us pulling out of a deal WE co-created. You can't do it mate, you simply cannot create deals and then want to renaign on it when it suits you.
Bellamy's Caddy said:Pigeonho said:The PL are blocking us pulling out of a deal WE co-created. You can't do it mate, you simply cannot create deals and then want to renaign on it when it suits you.
I respect that point mate. But if Joe Hart had been rubbish this season and Brum wanted to send him back early would the Premier League have blocked that? As long as in the premier leagues eyes Brum were ''sending him back'' then it should have been allowed regardless of what agreement was previously made, common sense should prevail. I know you have a different view and I respect that. However, personally I think its a disgrace.
larderland said:the bluemoon twitter is saying that the problem with hart is the fact that hart doesnt want to come back to us as he has a problem with us over the way we treated him.....i said this for months on this forum,he doesnt seem like he ever wants to play for us again...alll of his interviews on tv and papers suggest he never wants to come back.......
Pigeonho said:Bellamy's Caddy said:Thanks for the update.
Gutted. We're allowed to bring in another keeper, but not the keeper we actually own, even when Birmingham have agreed to it? Has to be the most stupid decision ever. Does make you wonder at times if its just a conspiracy against us, rules and fastracking of decisions always seem to work against us. I wonder if it was the rags in this situation if the outcome would have been the same....Forward with Fulop I guess.
The PL are blocking us pulling out of a deal WE co-created. You can't do it mate, you simply cannot create deals and then want to renaign on it when it suits you.