Blue Smarties
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 26,947
hmm.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Emergency keeper loan / Hart / Brum [All merged]
- Thread starter There is a Light
- Start date
Know Fulop's already been confirmed, but just been reading this:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/mancity/7641382/Premier-League-block-Manchester-City-bid-to-bring-back-Joe-Hart.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -Hart.html</a>
Joke really, that our own player coming back would provide too much of an advantage. For God's sake, Given getting injured put us at a big disadvantage so surely Hart coming back would even it back up? Cunts.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/mancity/7641382/Premier-League-block-Manchester-City-bid-to-bring-back-Joe-Hart.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -Hart.html</a>
It is understood that the Premier League board felt that allowing Hart, chosen as the keeper in the PFA's team of the year and a likely member of England's World Cup squad, would be too much of an advantage to City in their battle for fourth place and qualification for the Champions League.
Joke really, that our own player coming back would provide too much of an advantage. For God's sake, Given getting injured put us at a big disadvantage so surely Hart coming back would even it back up? Cunts.
bluemanc
Well-Known Member
You are falling into line with what you want rather than what is,their is NO rule covering a goalkeeper on loan returning to his club BEFORE the loan deal has expired,Everton asked us to take Jo BACK we REFUSED,if we had agreed the loan deal as agreed by both clubs would have been terminated.Pigeonho said:Lancet Fluke said:But is it reneging on a deal if the other party involved in the deal (Brimingham) are agreeable? In terms of the legality of the situation, I'm not sure why getting our own keeper back is not a more acceptable solution than getting Fulop. Apart from the fact that if we get Hart, Villa and Spurs will kick off whereas if we get Fulop they won't. Mind you, if Fulop starts and plays well, maybe they still will. Basically nobody minds as long as who we sign is shit and plays shit.
It wouldn't matter if we'd loaned Hart to Hull, who are now down. Rules are rules and we allowed a player out for a full season and now we are in deep shit we want it back, cos it suits us. Doesn't work that way. As SWP'sback has had a pop though, i'll keep quiet now, as I don't want to offend anymore unwiped, hairy fanny's like him just cos I have a point of view which is in effect, an actual fact.
If Brum refuse then that is another matter,but no rule exists in any form.
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
so we now have an ex-spurs keeper in net against...spurs, clattenburg and bennett as refs, forgive me for being a tiny bit cynical about the whole situation...
MCC
Well-Known Member
davj292 said:we've signed martin fulop....on mcfc.co.uk.....agreement couldn't be reached with brum
Thick Brummie cunts. No chance of Hart returning to them next season.
The club should have stood by Gunnar from the start. I don't understand it he is a Man City goalie, one of our own and they bailed on him straight away. He could have played three blinding games but we will never know because in their wisdom they have decided to beg for Sunderlands 3rd choice goalie. I would rather it all go shit shaped but know we played as a team than this. If this doesn't come off and Gunnar does play he will be brimming with confidence knowing how highly he is thought of at the club.
Even worse, if he doesn't play they will have spoilt my fairytale ending, I have been humming the theme to Escape To Victory all day, I could just see Gunnar making that match winning save!! oh well..
Even worse, if he doesn't play they will have spoilt my fairytale ending, I have been humming the theme to Escape To Victory all day, I could just see Gunnar making that match winning save!! oh well..
Blue Smarties
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 26,947
The whole things a joke, I'd rather have Gunnar in goal and he fuck it up than Fulop.
bluemanc
Well-Known Member
If that is factual from the FA they have just made a rule up,if City & Brum agree to terminate the loan it is dead in the water.Halfpenny said:Know Fulop's already been confirmed, but just been reading this:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/mancity/7641382/Premier-League-block-Manchester-City-bid-to-bring-back-Joe-Hart.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -Hart.html</a>
It is understood that the Premier League board felt that allowing Hart, chosen as the keeper in the PFA's team of the year and a likely member of England's World Cup squad, would be too much of an advantage to City in their battle for fourth place and qualification for the Champions League.
Joke really, that our own player coming back would provide too much of an advantage. For God's sake, Given getting injured put us at a big disadvantage so surely Hart coming back would even it back up? Cunts.
happyblue.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 50
MCC said:davj292 said:we've signed martin fulop....on mcfc.co.uk.....agreement couldn't be reached with brum
Thick Brummie *****. No chance of Hart returning to them next season.
It wasn't Brum matey, Prem Chiefs wouldn't allow it, hence not being able to reach agreement with them. The club are just letting us know that they did indeed go back for Joe!!
Skip Donoghue
Well-Known Member
i can see why the premier league won't let us take JH back
he has just been voted by his fellow pros the best goalkeeper in the country and has proven that he is worthy of this with his displays while on a season long loan where a fee was paid to birmingham, and he is more than likely going to be in the england squad for the world cup if not the 1st eleven,
now lets just say JH was allowed back and he has 3 great games for us and keeps us in those games with a string of saves enabling us to win our final 3 games and getting 4th spot
imagine the uproar if this were to happen, the decision to allow it would be contested by spurs, liverpool and villa and it could get very messy for city in terms of legal proceedings and more importantly for the premier league there is no way they are going to put there necks on the line for city why should they
if spurs or villa were in our position and wanted to do the same i would expect the premier league to act the same way
the reason it won't happen is it could be seen as giving city an unfair advantage and that could be argued in court
if fullop comes in and does a great job for us no one will bother as he is a reserve keeper and is not expected to do any more than fill a shirt
he has just been voted by his fellow pros the best goalkeeper in the country and has proven that he is worthy of this with his displays while on a season long loan where a fee was paid to birmingham, and he is more than likely going to be in the england squad for the world cup if not the 1st eleven,
now lets just say JH was allowed back and he has 3 great games for us and keeps us in those games with a string of saves enabling us to win our final 3 games and getting 4th spot
imagine the uproar if this were to happen, the decision to allow it would be contested by spurs, liverpool and villa and it could get very messy for city in terms of legal proceedings and more importantly for the premier league there is no way they are going to put there necks on the line for city why should they
if spurs or villa were in our position and wanted to do the same i would expect the premier league to act the same way
the reason it won't happen is it could be seen as giving city an unfair advantage and that could be argued in court
if fullop comes in and does a great job for us no one will bother as he is a reserve keeper and is not expected to do any more than fill a shirt