Emilio Lawrence

Stoned Rose said:
The Rags (and Stoke) are now working under different rules than every other club when it comes to “RTCs” (posh acronym for Academy).

In girls football, as of the coming season, the FA have ruled that clubs must “skip” age groups so only have u8, u10, u12 u14 and u16.

There are no u7, u9, u11, u13 or u15 teams.

The Rags and Stoke aren’t subject to this and their age groups run right through. Not sure why. This obviously makes both of those clubs more attractive to female players and gives both clubs the opportunity for consistency.
Click to expand...
How can that be allowed? It makes no sense.
 
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:
Needs a word with himself on this one, she’s absolute dynamite, plays like we all did, takes no shit and technically way above her peers, however, this allegiance bollocks is part of the dark ages…. You play for the love, which she does and when that is compromised it taints the game for them….

If I get wind she’ll be going to any trials, united or not as the end goal is her happiness, which she doesn’t need to mask with any hatred for those red cunts, they become the stepping stone!
Click to expand...

Wes Brown was around a couple of years after I was but I remember playing against him a couple of times as he “played up” a year or two.
 
Skip Donoghue said:
A few years ago I had my youngest lads team u7 at the time playing in a tournament at Curzon Ashton, the place was crawling with Everton scouts in all their Everton gear, you couldn't miss them and when they liked the look of a boy the 1st question they would ask was who the parents were, not because they wanted to speak to them, but so they could see the physical build of the parents and they would then get an idea what the son was going to be like
I found this a strange way to do things but hey ho they're the pros

There was 1 United scout, you wouldn't have known he was there, until he produced his scouts ID no gear on just a bloke watching football, he wasn't inrerested in anything but the skilful kids no matter the size of parent or kid

It just shows how each club do things differently at that time City were all about physical and athletic to (it was just before the takeover) United took my best player that day into their academy and he's from a family of Blues and he is still a Blue himself,

City wanted him but he didn't like the set up at City then and his parents sent him where he was comfortable
he's still playing professional football and he's in his 20s now
Click to expand...
That’s why my kids haven’t been scouted, they’ve took one look at me and thought “fat ****”
 
Stoned Rose said:
Not sure. It’s only been brought in in the last few weeks and there’s been murder.
Click to expand...
Surely all the other clubs have complained if the rule doesn't apply to all. How did you find out about this? Thanks for passing the info on, hard to find info about junior leagues.
 
Stoned Rose said:
The Rags (and Stoke) are now working under different rules than every other club when it comes to “RTCs” (posh acronym for Academy).

In girls football, as of the coming season, the FA have ruled that clubs must “skip” age groups so only have u8, u10, u12 u14 and u16.

There are no u7, u9, u11, u13 or u15 teams.

The Rags and Stoke aren’t subject to this and their age groups run right through. Not sure why. This obviously makes both of those clubs more attractive to female players and gives both clubs the opportunity for consistency.
Click to expand...
Who are the united and stoke u7, u9, u11, u13 or u15 teams playing against... Each other?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.