chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 23,564
Agreed, assuming it’s the move that the player actually wants.How can they reject an offer higher than the clause? Surely if the clause is payed it's out of the clubs hands?
Agreed, assuming it’s the move that the player actually wants.How can they reject an offer higher than the clause? Surely if the clause is payed it's out of the clubs hands?
Player would get more wages. Whether he gets more shot at Trophies is different story. Chelsea despite mammoth spending don't look like mounting a title challenge for some reason, I can be wrong here but this is what I feel. Potter has history of going on winless streak unlike City Or Pool who can ho in winning streaks especially City. 38 match sustained title challenge os different storyHow can they reject an offer higher than the clause? Surely if the clause is payed it's out of the clubs hands?
It'll be a kicker to the club to accept terms of payment, hes an extra XX and we'll pay this over X windows instead of upfront. Im assuming.How can they reject an offer higher than the clause? Surely if the clause is payed it's out of the clubs hands?
Chelsea turning into psg? how can they comply with ffp after spending blindly?Chelsea ready to trigger Enzo Fernandez £105m release clause
Chelsea have communicated their willingness to pay Argentina midfielder Enzo Fernandez’s £105million release clause at Benfica.www.standard.co.uk
Chelsea spend a crazy amount of money.
Chelsea turning into psg? how can they comply with ffp after spending blindly?
Will both end up the same mate if the €127m buyout clause is correct? In fact, Jude probably higher!I wonder if Enzo's price will have any impact on the Bellingham fee.
The new owner rule, meaning they can have a three year period of accelerated squad investment, as long as the owner can prove they've personally got the money to spend & it's not a loan leveraged against the club.Chelsea turning into psg? how can they comply with ffp after spending blindly?
The new owner rule, meaning they can have a three year period of accelerated squad investment, as long as the owner can prove they've personally got the money to spend & it's not a loan leveraged against the club.
It's the same new owner consideration we asked for 12 years ago & were told to fuck off. )(
How can they reject an offer higher than the clause? Surely if the clause is payed it's out of the clubs hands?