aguerrrroooooooooooo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2016
- Messages
- 11,040
No youre problem is that you think it's up to you to make unneeded superficial judgements so that you can present yourself as "the voice of reason" withough really adding anything to the debate beyond trying to dismiss people for engaging in it. Surely you could have simply scrutinised the substance and see how much i either presented things as fact or purely as my own speculation but you rather saw it oportune to jump to a dismissive judgement withought substance.
I see nothing (ethicaly or in terms of rules) wrong with me speculating on this forum, the only way you would have a point is if you could show that i would be presenting something as fact which i was purely speculating about.
Some added news on the case
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/worl...s-morning-of-death/ar-AAFEfZY?ocid=spartanntp
It appears that at the time of Epsteins suicide the prison was understaffed with a number of people working overtime.
and:
https://www.newser.com/story/279012/epsteins-prison-safeguards-had-been-removed.html
It also appears that Epstein had a celmate which had been promised to him, but the celmate was taken out the cell a few days before.
He was to bunk with a cellmate in a special housing unit and receive a check from a guard every 30 minutes. But the Times' sources say that cellmate had recently been moved, and the guard checks didn't occur the night before Epstein's apparent suicide.
You know it's a really poor coverup when somewhat respected sources of the mainstream media are referring to it as an "apparent suicide"