Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell


St Helena would be a good place to put him. Although cut his cock off before he dies.

Absolutely dreadful family.

If it was a member of the general public whose child was accused of repeated sex crimes and hanging out with nonces they would be getting absolute dog's abuse?

Why is the Queen immune from scrutiny about how she raised her children?
 
Surely the broadness of that agreement can be argued? Holy fuck. If agreements like that can be signed then society is fucked. A paltry 500k. What was she thinking?
 
St Helena would be a good place to put him. Although cut his cock off before he dies.

Absolutely dreadful family.

If it was a member of the general public whose child was accused of repeated sex crimes and hanging out with nonces they would be getting absolute dog's abuse?

Why is the Queen immune from scrutiny about how she raised her children?
I think that you seem to have decided upon his guilt. Further to that, you have probably decided his guilt prior to any charges being levelled.

The sort of abuse that is being said happened and did happen is heinous but I would rather due process be followed than some random Royal hater on the internet deciding anyone's fate.
 
I think that you seem to have decided upon his guilt. Further to that, you have probably decided his guilt prior to any charges being levelled.

The sort of abuse that is being said happened and did happen is heinous but I would rather due process be followed than some random Royal hater on the internet deciding anyone's fate.

Irrelevant. He cannot face charges because of the statute of limitations, this is a civil trial. He will never be found guilty of any crimes.

I reserve the right to thank what I like of a family who have servants to squeeze their toothpaste for them and use the press to brief against other members of their own family.

Furthermore people can make their own judgements about someone who seeks to rely on an out of court settlement agreed by a dead paedophile, after playing cat and mouse with the lawyers serving papers on him.
 
Irrelevant. He cannot face charges because of the statute of limitations, this is a civil trial. He will never be found guilty of any crimes.

I reserve the right to thank what I like of a family who have servants to squeeze their toothpaste for them and use the press to brief against other members of their own family.

Furthermore people can make their own judgements about someone who seeks to rely on an out of court settlement agreed by a dead paedophile, after playing cat and mouse with the lawyers serving papers on him.
Good for you.
 
St Helena would be a good place to put him. Although cut his cock off before he dies.

Absolutely dreadful family.

If it was a member of the general public whose child was accused of repeated sex crimes and hanging out with nonces they would be getting absolute dog's abuse?

Why is the Queen immune from scrutiny about how she raised her children?
She didnt raise any of her children, get with it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.