Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

You’re copying my City bingo point and replying to me with it :-)

I don’t fucking know if he knew, neither do you but you’re guessing that Mi5 do background checks on very well known celebrities before the Palace meets them. You don’t know if they did or not. Neither do I.

The only difference is you’ve decided they have. Well you can carry on if you want but don’t go on like it’s confirmed fact.
I’m not guessing anything. It is standard procedure to deep check on anyone who comes into contact with the future king. And the closer and more regular the contact, the deeper and more extensive the background checks.

It is 100% fact that Saville‘s predilections for children and corpses were communicated to Charles. And also 100% true that for reasons of his own, Charles decided to enter into a years long, deeply personal relationship with him. I wonder what a relatively minor tv celeb from the north of England could possibly have that Lord Mountbatten’s nephew wanted so badly?

I have my own ideas as to why he would do that but that’s probably for another thread.
 
I’m not guessing anything. It is standard procedure to deep check on anyone who comes into contact with the future king. And the closer and more regular the contact, the deeper and more extensive the background checks.

It is 100% fact that Saville‘s predilections for children and corpses were communicated to Charles. And also 100% true that for reasons of his own, Charles decided to enter into a years long, deeply personal relationship with him.

I have my own ideas as to why he would do that but that’s probably for another thread.
There’s a guy 2 replies above who’s met Prince Phillip and wasn’t vetted.

Your “100% fact” when you have no concrete evidence suggests to me you’re not exactly objective.
 
I have been in the same room, and close enough to smell the breath of Phil the Greek (along with a handful of others(, with no additional vetting over and above of that to do our jobs)

Yes but you worked for Airbus, obviously you would have already had high level clearance anyway.

And you can't possibly know whether or not they did or didn't carry out enhanced vetting behind the scenes.

E.g. Whether or not you were on a list have people who had accessed "islamic websites" or had attended the same watering holes as Irish Republicans.
 
There’s a guy 2 replies above who’s met Prince Phillip and wasn’t vetted.

Your “100% fact” when you have no concrete evidence suggests to me you’re not exactly objective.
No.

There’s a guy two posts above me who was in a room - once - with Phillip. And he WILL have been checked, believe me he WILL have been. He might not know he was, but you can take to the bank the FACT that he will have been.

With respect to the poster, we aren’t talking about a random one off opportunity to meet Phillip. We are talking about a predator who met privately with the future king dozens of times, over many years. A predator who was widely known about.

But the security services decided - not once but dozens of times - to think “ah sod it. He’s a known paedophile and necophiliac but the future king won’t come to any harm being alone in his presence along with his vulnerable wife and young children. One of whom is the future future king”
Or you can believe that they did tell lord Mountbatten’s nephew he was in the presence of a known predator who specialised in procuring young children and said future king decided - for reasons one can only guess at of course - “I’ll have a bit of that”
 
Haha again more fucking guessing!

You don’t have a scooby ffs!
it's not guessing. the security services will know what any of the senior royals are doing at any given time. it's a part of their actual job description. and if they find out anything untoward they will tell their boss. see if you can work out who their boss is (as a clue, there was a James Bond film called "On *blank blank*'s secret service". see if you can guess)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.