Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,792
Biggest winner out of this?
Kurt Zouma.
Offended Twitter has a new target.
Kurt Zouma.
Offended Twitter has a new target.
My understanding is he has to pay her and make a substantial donation to charity?There have been lots of versions of her story over the years and it appears that there is no original version of the photo of Andrew with his arm around her waist at Maxwells London house so maybe her legal team weren’t overly confident of winning the court case.
It’s the only logical reason I can see for her settling for a payment to her charity.
A no man's land where most will not be giving him the benefit of the doubt.No. It means he isn't tried so remains innocent. Some will say it is to pay off a victim and say he is guilty, some will say that it is to protect his image and stop any personal/sensitive details of his, his family and associates that may arise in a court case and they will say the case is unproven. It's a no-man's land.
95% of yank cases are settled before court , it is not a criminal case , she has forced him to settle therefore admitting he is in the wrong and he has had to give her probably several million to her charity , he knew he had no leg to stand on at a trial
I don't see it as simple as her selling out. I suspect that there was enormous establishment pressure placed on her to take the deal. There's a fair chance they have something on her that will now remain a secret as part of the settlement.she has sold out and its why the system is fucked ? many woman was hoping she would take it all the way and hoped to be a leading light in the fight. but sadly its now she is seen as a money grabber that does not care about anybody but herself ?
greedy and am not sorry for her ? she got what she always wanted out of this
Think that is a harsh assessment.she has sold out and its why the system is fucked ? many woman was hoping she would take it all the way and hoped to be a leading light in the fight. but sadly its now she is seen as a money grabber that does not care about anybody but herself ?
greedy and am not sorry for her ? she got what she always wanted out of this
A no man's land where most will not be giving him the benefit of the doubt.
The later is not part of this civil case , it is about her being a victim .What I can't understand is that she seemed absolutely adamant she would take it to court and that no money offer in any settlement would stop her. I understand with negotiations that you go for a high ask first, whilst always secretly knowing what lower ask is acceptable (and not going below) but I can't understand why she didn't take it to court.
Was she warned by her advisers that her "grooming" of other girls was a really weak point in her case and that it might have been used by the defence?
There have been lots of versions of her story over the years and it appears that there is no original version of the photo of Andrew with his arm around her waist at Maxwells London house so maybe her legal team weren’t overly confident of winning the court case.
It’s the only logical reason I can see for her settling for a payment to her charity.