blueish swede
Well-Known Member
Mountbatten?
Mountbatten?
Epstein/Windsor/Maxwell.Shouldn't this now be Epstein/Andrew/Maxwell?
No you daft sod, popularity is important because they’re going nowhere whilst the public likes them. And more like even Charles than don’t, and his successor is very popular. No government is going to bring anything against the monarchy to get rid whilst the public support them and even with this latest scandal, they’re very popular. The public would have to be chomping at the bit to get rid of them for any Prime Minister to have the balls for constitutional change and even then they’d probably pass the buck and try and not disrupt it.It shouldn’t be a popularity contest. Sounds like one of singing competitions on TV. I’ve no doubt the family will still exist. It certainly won’t be in the public eye as it is now. You seem desperate about it all. You don’t know them. You know what the PR machine wants you to know. The corruption surrounding them stinks. Folk like you see past it all like they want you to. It’s all very silly when you sit back and think about it.
Battenberg!Mountbatten?
Deffo Richard III
Without cheating I know the last king was Richard III but I don’t know the last family member.
Who was it?
Depends on how you define Royal Family ;-)"Active service" is Prince George.
Although non-operational duties.
Prince George, Duke of Kent - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
During Battle, you have to go back to WW1.
Prince Maurice of Battenberg - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
‘Daft sod’?. Maybe if you’ve served your country like I have you would have a bit more respect for other people..No you daft sod, popularity is important because they’re going nowhere whilst the public likes them. And more like even Charles than don’t, and his successor is very popular. No government is going to bring anything against the monarchy to get rid whilst the public support them and even with this latest scandal, they’re very popular. The public would have to be chomping at the bit to get rid of them for any Prime Minister to have the balls for constitutional change and even then they’d probably pass the buck and try and not disrupt it.
I’m a royalist because of the institution being good for the country rather than any celebrity aspect to it. I don’t about weddings or whatever, I respect the Queen and the institution.
Depends on how you define Royal Family ;-)
Definitely "last monarch" then.I was being generous, otherwise I think it definitely is Richard III, if we use our masters and betters' narrower definition.