Eric Garcia to Barcelona

Status
Not open for further replies.
couldnt care less when he goes. H ehas shown he cannt be a top centre half in the premier league....he hasnt got the physical attributes needed and Id happily sell him to Barca....7-8m is fine but if the club wnat more and Barca wont pay it then hold him tot he end of his contract...Barca dont get the player they want/need for another 6 months.....its exaclty what they have done with Messi - we lose 7-20m (depending upon our evaluation of him - they could lose a lot lot more on Messi if he does come here.
 
willipp said:
Genuinely don't see the point in keeping him passed Jan. Take the 7/8 million, give Stones and THB the 4th CB spot and move on from this sideshow we don't need. Far too many of these side stories going on and for a player thats leaving anyway, cut our losses and take the cash.
Click to expand...

Stones has proven he is not reliable enough from a fitness point of view. Ake has had issues. Laporte has had issues. No harm in having cover.

Garcia is better than THB right now and thats what matters. I dont think anyone at the club is expecting Garcia to be around next season but this season hes good cover.
 
According to the Cartel in general, if we had broken FFP rules, we effectively 'cheated' by purchasing players or having a wage bill we couldn't afford. We didn't.

This situation if correct, means Barca have been buying players & or paying wages they couldn't afford.

So they have gained the advantage of having used that money to maintain their status at the expense of others.

Covid is no excuse. They have just prevented Messi from removing millions from their wage bill.

They have been cheating.
 
Neville Kneville said:
According to the Cartel in general, if we had broken FFP rules, we effectively 'cheated' by purchasing players or having a wage bill we couldn't afford. We didn't.

This situation if correct, means Barca have been buying players & or paying wages they couldn't afford.

So they have gained the advantage of having used that money to maintain their status at the expense of others.

Covid is no excuse. They have just prevented Messi from removing millions from their wage bill.

They have been cheating.
Click to expand...
Where is Uefa I hear you say? standing watching with a big smile...lets go back to city they are the problem. Wankers
 
Neville Kneville said:
According to the Cartel in general, if we had broken FFP rules, we effectively 'cheated' by purchasing players or having a wage bill we couldn't afford. We didn't.

This situation if correct, means Barca have been buying players & or paying wages they couldn't afford.

So they have gained the advantage of having used that money to maintain their status at the expense of others.

Covid is no excuse. They have just prevented Messi from removing millions from their wage bill.

They have been cheating.
Click to expand...
Does indicate how absolutely ineffective FFP is in it's supposed aims, when a club as big as Barca could go bankrupt and FFP has done nothing to prevent it
 
citizen_maine said:
Does indicate how absolutely ineffective FFP is in it's supposed aims, when a club as big as Barca could go bankrupt and FFP has done nothing to prevent it
Click to expand...

It was only contrived to stop us.

UEFA don't care about clubs going bust as the big teams like Barca will always attract money from sponsors, or a new owner to buy them out of trouble, and they don't care about clubs like Bolton or Portsmouth, that's just an excuse to change the rules because Utd and Bayern, etc got scared.

Unfortunately we played along with their bent rules and didn't fuck them over in court or challenge why it is ok for Utd to be in hundreds of millions of debt yet continue to spend. They can't have it both ways.

Why is it ok for rags to keep buying £90m players while owing the Glazers' banks £400m? Yet we get punished if we spend £20m more than we had in income over a season?
 
Semper aggressus said:
It was only contrived to stop us.

UEFA don't care about clubs going bust as the big teams like Barca will always attract money from sponsors, or a new owner to buy them out of trouble, and they don't care about clubs like Bolton or Portsmouth, that's just an excuse to change the rules because Utd and Bayern, etc got scared.

Unfortunately we played along with their bent rules and didn't fuck them over in court or challenge why it is ok for Utd to be in hundreds of millions of debt yet continue to spend. They can't have it both ways.

Why is it ok for rags to keep buying £90m players while owing the Glazers' banks £400m? Yet we get punished if we spend £20m more than we had in income over a season?
Click to expand...
i know mate - that's why i said 'supposed'
 
Semper aggressus said:
It was only contrived to stop us.

UEFA don't care about clubs going bust as the big teams like Barca will always attract money from sponsors, or a new owner to buy them out of trouble, and they don't care about clubs like Bolton or Portsmouth, that's just an excuse to change the rules because Utd and Bayern, etc got scared.

Unfortunately we played along with their bent rules and didn't fuck them over in court or challenge why it is ok for Utd to be in hundreds of millions of debt yet continue to spend. They can't have it both ways.

Why is it ok for rags to keep buying £90m players while owing the Glazers' banks £400m? Yet we get punished if we spend £20m more than we had in income over a season?
Click to expand...
As a cup 1/2 full man i get to see a utd team with unmanageable debts, unaffordable wage bill with a team at least 9 top class players off being anywhere near competitive with rules put in place by them that now stop them from buying their way out of trouble with short term investment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.