Not sure about that, I would think the Haaland deal will be considerably more expensive on agent fees alone.Agreed. Can't see the fee being too different to the Kane one, wages pretty similar. This just makes more sense.
After seeing those 2000 dollar jammies he had on in Greece, it's become bloody obvious that he's not the sort of character needed here.
You say that like you the one forking out the 150 million and not the richest club in the world. The sheikh could drop that amount in the street and it wouldn’t be worth his time to pick it back upI wouldn't mind Kane or Haaland but the fees for both are insane and they are not the only two strikers in the world. I hope that we are looking at someone else, under the radar, like we did with Dias last season.
As long as it's not Ings.
Don't have an account?Register now!