Bluesince88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2021
- Messages
- 980
- Team supported
- City
A little harsh to suggest we are that gullible we only want Kane because we are linked. I’m unsure what you want from a striker, I want mine to score a shit load of goals. Something he has GUARANTEED all his career.All fair, but much better to skip a season than 5 or so.
I don't see Kane as a guarantee, certainly not over a number of years. I definitely don't see him as 100m player. If prior to Sergio's drop in fitness and while still contracted to us, someone had suggested replacing him with Kane for 100m, we'd all have laughed our socks off. If that interview hadn't come out yet and with it this taking it for granted it is a done deal, I wonder how many of those arguing he is the best (which he is not, amongst the top at most) would be adbocating signing him with no links whatsoever. To me it feels a bit bias for the fact we think we can land him rather than should get him.
Took us ages to sort out CBs, and a lot of money. Doesn't need to happen with a forward.
We didn’t replace Kompany along with then getting hurt with injuries. Aguero gone we are a Gabby injury away from having nobody. Sheer lunacy to be in that position, can’t win the league and then be weaker the following year as we know. Top goal scorer, top assists, great pen taker and all for a team that do very little each year. He is clinical, imagine a ruthless striker on the end of what we create.