I'd buy into that were it not for the Kane thing.Theres a reason our fantastic owners have been reletively prudent this window. This lad
I'd buy into that were it not for the Kane thing.Theres a reason our fantastic owners have been reletively prudent this window. This lad
But was said it was pep who was driving wanting kane - not the owners. Would add up even more then.I'd buy into that were it not for the Kane thing.
Dortmund will sell him in January, I have no doubt about that. They will not settle for 70 million in the summer and they are right. Haaland will help them reach the top 16 in the Champions League and will be sold for at least 100 million. If we're smart we'll close a deal with them right now. I'm somehow optimistic because after realizing that Harry Kane was not coming we did not go and sign a striker just to say we brought a striker. By January we can get along by with what we already have. But if we want to win the PL and certainly the Champions League we have to bring Haaland.
Dortmund will sell him in January, I have no doubt about that. They will not settle for 70 million in the summer and they are right. Haaland will help them reach the top 16 in the Champions League and will be sold for at least 100 million. If we're smart we'll close a deal with them right now. I'm somehow optimistic because after realizing that Harry Kane was not coming we did not go and sign a striker just to say we brought a striker. By January we can get along by with what we already have. But if we want to win the PL and certainly the Champions League we have to bring Haaland.
I don't understand when people say this with such conviction. PSG just turned down 200m euros for a player who's gonna leave on a free in a year. For a lot of teams the stubbornness plays a bigger role than money ever could.Imo there’s no way Dortmund wouldn’t have sold him this summer if that release clause is valid from January.
They’ve clearly made the decision that having Haaland for the season more or less guarantees then champions league football the year after. No way are they turning down an extra 50+ million on top of the release clause to keep him for 4 months and leave mid season, which is exactly what would happen if it’s valid then. They would then need to replace him in a January window, when clubs rarely sell decent players.
Far more likely that it’s valid next summer.