Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let’s say Haaland/Raiola/Dortmund have 4 clubs prepared to meet his release clause, one may or may not be City. As has been said we don’t know if the City are interested.

Haaland will no doubt be thinking where is the best project and, Raiola will tell him which club is offering the best financial deal. The best project may be the same team willing to pay the most. If it isn’t the same team, then Haaland will need to decide if he forgoes the best project for the team offering a better fee. Of course we don’t know what project each team will offer.

We have been told that Haaland thinks the Premier league is the best league. We know he has been on the terraces as a teen supporting City.

Whether City will even be in for him, or return to Kane bid, or by 2022 maybe Torres or even Delap will have asserted their prowess as a forward in the first 11. Only time will tell.

As of right now though we should be interested in him if we truly want an out and out goalscorer, as he also fits our profile because of his age.
 
Let’s say Haaland/Raiola/Dortmund have 4 clubs prepared to meet his release clause, one may or may not be City. As has been said we don’t know if the City are interested.

Haaland will no doubt be thinking where is the best project and, Raiola will tell him which club is offering the best financial deal. The best project may be the same team willing to pay the most. If it isn’t the same team, then Haaland will need to decide if he forgoes the best project for the team offering a better fee. Of course we don’t know what project each team will offer.

We have been told that Haaland thinks the Premier league is the best league. We know he has been on the terraces as a teen supporting City.

Whether City will even be in for him, or return to Kane bid, or by 2022 maybe Torres or even Delap will have asserted their prowess as a forward in the first 11. Only time will tell.

As of right now though we should be interested in him if we truly want an out and out goalscorer, as he also fits our profile because of his age.
Can’t see us going back for Kane it was this window or move on. It’s not like the Messi saga. I actually think we should pay whatever is required to get this guy. It’s time for us to stamp our mark and this is the guy to do it with
 
I would refuse it yes, if there is any truth that a club interested in signing him are going to be paying around £25 million each to Raiola and Alfie plus a signing on fee for the player himself then it would be madness.

Basically £65 million fee plus around the same again in agent fee's and signing of fees mean we would be committing to an outlay in excess of £130 million before wages knowing that after 4 years the player could walk away on a free transfer.
That assumed “facts” not in evidence, so I can’t have that discussion.

Clearly, paying an agent and a Dad £65M to get a player is ridiculous on its face.

Like you, I would tell them to not let the door hit them in the arse on the way out!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.