Nothing in terms of winning trophies etc, he is an outstanding talent, that is without question, but is he at the stage when he can make demands in terms of 400k wages?
Which of our players have won trophies before being signed? Mahrez must be our only player that did something then. So by that logic, Kane hasn't won anything and shouldn't cost anywhere near as much as we were supposedly prepared to pay.
I think 400k for a striker that scores 70 goals in 70 games in a top league is a bargain. Regardless of age and trophies. I include kane in that, who last summer would have reportedly got more than that. The fact he is only 21 might even strengthen that demand, not weaken it.
Would you pay 400k for messi back at 21, if you could?
Last edited: