Agree with most of that, but just to play devil’s advocate, those tight games we’ve had this season, would they still be tight if we lost a midfielder for a striker, potentially giving some of our control up?I'm fairly sure I've heard Pep on various interviews in the past suggest he would like a proven goal machine or something along the lines since we don't have a recognised striker so we need to play this way i.e. false 9.
Our football attacking to date most likely arose from the lack of availability of Sergio during his latter years with us & Pep more from design by necessity than by choice adopted the false nine approach to acquire the goals which has been effective.
However, its obvious in certain games where there are fine margins & a player will only get one or two chances to make a difference a goal machine would aid us. Otherwise, we're expecting & I doubt Pep is either (no matter how high his expectations) for one of our midfielders to not only be creative but also become a Haaland goal machine which is unrealistic.
Or could we be 2 goals down & chasing the game as we’re not controlling it as well?
Whatever we gain from signing a striker will be offset somewhat by losing a wee bit of control
I find it all intriguing as it will mean a shift in tactics as/when/if we sign a striker
Whatever happens, I just think that Pep will figure a solution to keep on winning