Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
Am I then only one who doesn’t think this is the right deal for us? Will smash our wage structure for a start and he doesn’t really fit out style of play. Although he’s an old git now I still think Kane is a better fit..
And the ‘City buying football’ brigade will have a field day too (though feck them actually, look what PSG do and they get background the stock we do..)
Mate, he's 21 and has 27 goals in 25 European games. He'd fit anyone's style of play. There is literally no downside to this signing.
 
Am I then only one who doesn’t think this is the right deal for us? Will smash our wage structure for a start and he doesn’t really fit out style of play. Although he’s an old git now I still think Kane is a better fit..
And the ‘City buying football’ brigade will have a field day too (though feck them actually, look what PSG do and they get background the stock we do..)
- Kane will probably be on the same wages as Haaland if we signed him.

- Bigger transfer fee.

- Overall higher cost with no sell on fee.

- 100% makes more sense to get Haaland who is still young and can probably adapt to Peps way of playing.

- we also shouldn’t give a f*ck what other people think about our spending.
 
Am I then only one who doesn’t think this is the right deal for us? Will smash our wage structure for a start and he doesn’t really fit out style of play. Although he’s an old git now I still think Kane is a better fit..
And the ‘City buying football’ brigade will have a field day too (though feck them actually, look what PSG do and they get background the stock we do..)
What?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.