Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
SPIDERBOY said:
Uefa will not ban Barca,Madrid or Juve,IMO.
Think the Italian authourities may punish Juve......Spanish lot nor UEFA will do fuck all to Madrid or Barca,again,opinion.
Click to expand...
If they refuse to leave the super league what option do UEFA have but to ban them?
 
If madrid were banned from the champions league for two years maybe mbappe would reconsider his thoughts of wanting to go there, his contract is up next season, I think he's the better player of the two
 
Gus Cruz said:
Why do you think that? Because of the Sancho clause?
Click to expand...
It’s going to come down to how much he will cost. We’ve got about £80m coming in in sales and a good amount of tv/prize money, but we also have a debt of £126m to offset from last year for FFP purposes.

The more profit we can bank this year gives us more room to spend next season.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
It’s going to come down to how much he will cost. We’ve got about £80m coming in in sales and a good amount of tv/prize money, but we also have a debt of £126m to offset from last year for FFP purposes.

The more profit we can bank this year gives us more room to spend next season.
Click to expand...

I was asking about that July 1st date. Is that because Norway won’t be going to the Euros?
 
I'm Blue said:
Haaland or Kane?
Haaland everyday of the week and twice on Tuesdays.
I wouldn’t go near Kane at £100m+
Too many injuries and knocking on abit.
No doubting his talent, but paying that kind of money for an ageing striker with injuries seems very silly, considering we have one of them already.
Click to expand...
I also feel it may be easier to negotiate with Dortmund than Levy, they'll both demand similar fees, but Haaland does have the release clause kicking in next year.

Kane may be proven in the EPL, but injuries and age counts against him.
 
I'm Blue said:
Haaland or Kane?
Haaland everyday of the week and twice on Tuesdays.
I wouldn’t go near Kane at £100m+
Too many injuries and knocking on abit.
No doubting his talent, but paying that kind of money for an ageing striker with injuries seems very silly, considering we have one of them already.
Click to expand...

He's 27,28 in July.His injuries are over exaggerated.

We currently have a player who is 5 years older,so no we don't have one of them already.

However.....I agree,Haaland would be my preference.
 
Haaland may well stay, given BD are now in the CL positions and I doubt anyone will pay asking price.

I’d just as soon buy him now at “clause rate” and loan him back for a year as get into a bidding war. I think that might suit both teams, and it might save us a small fortune…even if we end up paying part of his wages next season!
 
ChicagoBlue said:
Haaland may well stay, given BD are now in the CL positions and I doubt anyone will pay asking price.

I’d just as soon buy him now at “clause rate” and loan him back for a year as get into a bidding war. I think that might suit both teams, and it might save us a small fortune…even if we end up paying part of his wages next season!
Click to expand...
Dortmund have no real incentive to sell this summer for the clause price. Possibly we could get him for €100M or €120M instead of €150M if we let him stay on loan but not €75M.
 
kun said:
Dortmund have no real incentive to sell this summer for the clause price. Possibly we could get him for €100M or €120M instead of €150M if we let him stay on loan but not €75M.
Click to expand...
Haaland is kept happy because he gets his massive pay raise THIS YEAR, but gets to stay at BD. Plus, BD get the transfer fee to bed in his replacement (and then some) while he is still there.
 
ChicagoBlue said:
Haaland may well stay, given BD are now in the CL positions and I doubt anyone will pay asking price.

I’d just as soon buy him now at “clause rate” and loan him back for a year as get into a bidding war. I think that might suit both teams, and it might save us a small fortune…even if we end up paying part of his wages next season!
Click to expand...

He is leaving this summer.
 
From many report’s and snippets of ITK info on here we are getting a striker this summer. City will be telling Haaland it’s now or never, we aren’t waiting another year. This hopefully will push things along and force his hand. The talk of Kane as second choice is probably true and also puts the pressure on Haaland to come now or never. I think he will force this move and BD getting champs league won’t have any affect on this.
 
FantasyIreland said:
He's 27,28 in July.His injuries are over exaggerated.

We currently have a player who is 5 years older,so no we don't have one of them already.

However.....I agree,Haaland would be my preference.
Click to expand...
In the last 2/3 seasons there has been quite a drop off in his goals and games in the PL. Hardly missed a game in 4 seasons and scored 25 - 30 goals a season. Then in the last 2/3 years hes missed around 10 PL games a season and his goal scoring numbers have dropped down considerably.

Personally i think he'd score bag fulls of goals for us, but there is a slight concern over his ankles and general ability to stay fit, which could well get worse as he gets older. Its an expensive risk to take imo, but if Haaland isnt available, one i think we will take.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top