Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
Get him before Chelsea does and we will see him banging in goals for fun for a rival.

I dont wanna see the "hazard" trick where Haaland on twitter announces that he joins Chelsea.

f Abra spent big last summer for Lampard he will do the same after CL trophy for Tuchel. Can see them cashing in on Werner back to Bundesliga, Giroud is old, they might invest for Haaland or Kane.

We will end up with Ings lol.
 
Damanino said:
Get him before Chelsea does and we will see him banging in goals for fun for a rival.

I dont wanna see the "hazard" trick where Haaland on twitter announces that he joins Chelsea.

f Abra spent big last summer for Lampard he will do the same after CL trophy for Tuchel. Can see them cashing in on Werner back to Bundesliga, Giroud is old, they might invest for Haaland or Kane.

We will end up with Ings lol.
Click to expand...
If chelsea got haaland they would be nigh unbeatable
 
I'm Blue said:
This is the signing, not Kane.
Haaland would give us another dimension, big, powerful and would bully defenders.
Kane wouldn’t change all that much from what we’ve done before.
We can’t be that far off the price it would take to get him considering what Kane will cost.
A must.
Click to expand...

We’ve just spent a season without a striker. He’d make a massive difference and guarantee goals rather than relying on one of our midfielders to have the season of his life
 
skillman said:
We’ve just spent a season without a striker. He’d make a massive difference and guarantee goals rather than relying on one of our midfielders to have the season of his life
Click to expand...
Definitely, in fact he guarantees retaining the league.

However, I just don't see how Kane wouldn't be bullied by Rudiger the same way KDB was playing that position. Kane lacks pace and the past few years of UCL have shown pace and power gets you the trophy. Haaland gives you that.
 
Cheeky Txiki said:
Definitely, in fact he guarantees retaining the league.

However, I just don't see how Kane wouldn't be bullied by Rudiger the same way KDB was playing that position. Kane lacks pace and the past few years of UCL have shown pace and power gets you the trophy. Haaland gives you that.
Click to expand...

Kane is snide, it’s one of his main traits. If you can’t bully a guy then you have to get snide, simple.

I agree with Haaland, he’d be my first choice but if we don’t get him and go for Kane instead then it’s because Haaland isn’t available. The club will go for him before anybody else I think.

It just baffles me to see how some fans (not you it seems) are blinded to Kane’s obvious ability and threat just because of Haaland being around as if two players can’t be class in their own way.
 
skillman said:
Kane is snide, it’s one of his main traits. If you can’t bully a guy then you have to get snide, simple.

I agree with Haaland, he’d be my first choice but if we don’t get him and go for Kane instead then it’s because Haaland isn’t available. The club will go for him before anybody else I think.

It just baffles me to see how some fans (not you it seems) are blinded to Kane’s obvious ability and threat just because of Haaland being around as if two players can’t be class in their own way.
Click to expand...
I'd rather wait for haaland than box ourselves off by getting kane.....if haaland becomes available next transfer window no way we can go for him if kane is in our squad....
Haaland is a once in a generation player......
 
simon23 said:
I'd rather wait for haaland than box ourselves off by getting kane.....if haaland becomes available next transfer window no way we can go for him if kane is in our squad....
Haaland is a once in a generation player......
Click to expand...

I get what you’re saying but that means another season without a clinical finisher in the team...
 
Signing a striker won’t improve us much if we just drop them in an important game for an out of form player again. Some issues are not resolvable with piles of cash
 
I really want Haaland, I think he has the potential to be the best player in the world, at least the best striker in the world in the next decade. But I do have problem with him and I only realized this yesterday after the game. Teams against us play very very defensively. Sometimes all 11 players stand 30 meters from their goal. Haaland is a native goal scorer but he also has insane pace that helps him score a lot of goals for Dortmund. With us his speed will not be significant with the low defensive line of the opposing team. So I think in terms of who fits better to our system and need the answer is Kane. He has so much better game vision, passing skills, leadership, PL experience and also he is a serious threat with his header.
 
We get Haaland or blew the next 10 years with average striker possibilities that will flop 95%. That is so huge money loss, that it would be just stupid to pass this one 150m. There is no-one with same value and age. WE can buy countless amounts of Grealish style players that we have allready and forget that the most important thing is to get Haaland and nothing else.
 
MCFC ISRAEL said:
I really want Haaland, I think he has the potential to be the best player in the world, at least the best striker in the world in the next decade. But I do have problem with him and I only realized this yesterday after the game. Teams against us play very very defensively. Sometimes all 11 players stand 30 meters from their goal. Haaland is a native goal scorer but he also has insane pace that helps him score a lot of goals for Dortmund. With us his speed will not be significant with the low defensive line of the opposing team. So I think in terms of who fits better to our system and need the answer is Kane. He has so much better game vision, passing skills, leadership, PL experience and also he is a serious threat with his header.
Click to expand...
Haaland is fast but also finishes with amazing proficiency and could also be a great hold
up player which at times we need given his size.

I dont see anything Kane does that is better than Haaland and is older, more injury prone and more expensive
 
And not even the fact that we dont buy Haaland for example. But that team like Chelsea after ucl money will bring him as addition to their team would destroy so much of our own chances. I really hope that people in our staff will understand that 150m spending in one player that has real quality is better than buy bang average crap with 3x 50m no more depth, we have that allready.
 
M Gaudino said:
Haaland is fast but also finishes with amazing proficiency and could also be a great hold
up player which at times we need given his size.

I dont see anything Kane does that is better than Haaland and is older, more injury prone and more expensive
Click to expand...
Kane is a very good footballer far better at this time than Haaland.

But Haaland far better long term signing, he is the one for us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top