Erling Haaland

[lionheart]

£70m would be an incredible bargain, even with the addons.

Not going to happen. There is too much competition for his signature.

 

[FantasyIreland]

Stop believing fake news lol

He isnt,he's trolling as usual.

 

[waspish]

just popped back into the thread

i heard that city are happy to pay the release clause (£70million) plus addons totalling £30 million if targets are hit by haaaland plus city wave the sell on fee for sancho at 25%. so the total cost could be around £125 million
also haaland wages are the biggest in the club history and will be the highest paid in the premier league by any club

look the market value is not a problem even his wages are not a problem. city need a striker a world class one and the best at the moment is haaland. i just hope city get the deal set in stone and good 7 to 10 year deal without any loop holes or get outs and slap a £1billion in the first 5 years then £500million for the rest of the deal in a buy out clauses

we don't want another sane mistake

sancho sell on is 15%

 

[forlorn hope]

Man aren't you a ray of sunshine?

Supporting this lot since 1974 - more rain than sun!

 

[p.taker]

No one on here seems to have pointed out that we'll probably sign him for some astronomical amount and being City and knowing our luck he'll probably play two games before getting some season long injury - so do we know if City have some sort of plan B of looking for another striker or are we to be be left with just Jesus?

Mate, have you been in a coma the last ten years?

 

[ancoats]

sancho sell on is 15%

i thought it was 25% ? not bothered really just get the haaland deal done and dusted

 

[ancoats]

A few players won't be happy about his wages, they'll be knocking on Peps door.

but when you need goals and the team can not play without a striker then they must understand
wage value is always going to be like that at clubs and somebody always get more than the others

 

[Chi-town blues]

i thought it was 25% ? not bothered really just get the haaland deal done and dusted

maybe that’s rags sell on clause ?

 

[Dadsupportedthem]

but when you need goals and the team can not play without a striker then they must understand
wage value is always going to be like that at clubs and somebody always get more than the others

How do you figure that the team cannot play without a striker?

 

[ancoats]

You’ve been telling us all year that we don’t want a striker and won’t be going in for him based on secret information ‘from a friend’.

hahahah not me matey ?

am 100% backing haaland and city needing a striker we have been short for 3 or 4 seasons. even if jesus stays city could do to sign a up and coming striker or bring delap into the first team