HelloCity
Well-Known Member
Not sure I’d have Kane on the wing though.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erling Haaland
- Thread starter JOGAMIGMOG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Not sure I’d have Kane on the wing though.
Media are guessing. Here are some facts.
- Txiki on record saying that City believe football industry will recover to previous levels.
- Pep on record saying a £100m fee is possible.
- Club has announced Aguero contract won't be extended, opening up a space in the squad and finances.
- Haaland has 1 year left on his contract until the release clause kicks in and his Dad's career was ended suddenly through injury. There are clubs queuing up to guarantee him 5 years of big bucks NOW.
- Haaland has been openly complaining that the team he's in isn't good enough. Stormed off the pitch recently.
- Haaland has been making public statements comparing himself to Mbappe, Ronaldo and Messi, stoking the excitement around his talent.
- Raiola and Alfie touring Europe to speak to clubs, apparently with Dortmund's blessing (Rapha Honigstein)
- Dortmund unlikely to get CL football and their model relies on transfer fees anyway.
- Liverpool, United, Chelsea, City, Barcelona all in need of a new striker NOW.
- Dortmund had £91m on the table for Sancho last summer. This summer what will they be offered?
The idea that Dortmund would turn down an extra £25m+ and the 15% of Sancho's fee to get one year out of Haaland? In these circumstances? Nonsense. He could get a bad injury, his form and value could plummet, the potential buyers could go elsewhere this summer and rule themselves out due to the insane numbers quoted (Jovic, Kane, Lukaku, Andre Silva, Patson Daka etc.), some new kid on the block could emerge next summer.
He is on the move. Not saying to City but definitely somewhere.
- Txiki on record saying that City believe football industry will recover to previous levels.
- Pep on record saying a £100m fee is possible.
- Club has announced Aguero contract won't be extended, opening up a space in the squad and finances.
- Haaland has 1 year left on his contract until the release clause kicks in and his Dad's career was ended suddenly through injury. There are clubs queuing up to guarantee him 5 years of big bucks NOW.
- Haaland has been openly complaining that the team he's in isn't good enough. Stormed off the pitch recently.
- Haaland has been making public statements comparing himself to Mbappe, Ronaldo and Messi, stoking the excitement around his talent.
- Raiola and Alfie touring Europe to speak to clubs, apparently with Dortmund's blessing (Rapha Honigstein)
- Dortmund unlikely to get CL football and their model relies on transfer fees anyway.
- Liverpool, United, Chelsea, City, Barcelona all in need of a new striker NOW.
- Dortmund had £91m on the table for Sancho last summer. This summer what will they be offered?
The idea that Dortmund would turn down an extra £25m+ and the 15% of Sancho's fee to get one year out of Haaland? In these circumstances? Nonsense. He could get a bad injury, his form and value could plummet, the potential buyers could go elsewhere this summer and rule themselves out due to the insane numbers quoted (Jovic, Kane, Lukaku, Andre Silva, Patson Daka etc.), some new kid on the block could emerge next summer.
He is on the move. Not saying to City but definitely somewhere.
Last edited:
KennyG
Well-Known Member
This one.
I'd have Kane long before Sterling.
Anyone with eyes would! Sterling has no composure and he wont start now. He has his uses, he carries the ball well, but he is far from irreplaceable. Try Grealish
This one.
I'd have Kane long before Sterling.
Good for you, but it isn't about who you or I or anyone would rather have, thatbsets their value.
Given their age, injury records, whonthey play for, goals involved in, lentgh of contract etc etc, overall I just can't see on balance how kane is worth more than sterling.
Probably still stood in the centre circle watching everyone else run about.We are now broke. Wonder what bony is up to these days? :)
Sir peace frog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,534
- Location
- stalking the canals and rivers
- Team supported
- Manchester City Football Club
fact ; Haaland has 1 year left on his contract and his Dad's career was ended suddenly through injury.Media are guessing. Here are some facts.
- Txiki on record saying that City believe football industry will recover to previous levels.
- Pep on record saying a £100m fee is possible.
- Haaland has 1 year left on his contract and his Dad's career was ended suddenly through injury. There are clubs queuing up to guarantee him 5 years of big bucks NOW.
- Haaland has been openly complaining that the team he's in isn't good enough. Stormed off the pitch recently.
- Haaland has been making public statements comparing himself to Mbappe, Ronaldo and Messi, stoking the excitement around his talent.
- Raiola and Alfie touring Europe to speak to clubs, apparently with Dortmund's blessing (Rapha Honigstein)
- Dortmund unlikely to get CL football and their model relies on transfer fees anyway.
The idea that Dortmund would turn down an extra £25m+ and the 15% of Sancho's fee to get one year out of Haaland? In these circumstances? Nonsense. He could get a bad injury, his form and value could plummet, some new kid on the block could emerge next summer.
He is on the move. Not saying to City but somewhere.
is it fact he only has 1 year left on his contract, if so why does he have a buy clause in his contract next year ?
fact ; Haaland has 1 year left on his contract and his Dad's career was ended suddenly through injury.
is it fact he only has 1 year left on his contract, if so why does he have a buy clause in his contract next year ?
Sorry I meant 1 year until the release clause kicks in.
You clearly don't understand how release clauses work.
If there's no release clause and you don't want to sell the player you can give him any price you want. A release clause limits that. They have ZERO benefit to the (selling) club. Look at Neymar, Barca gave him an "insane" "hands-off" release clause of €222M. A few years later after the market had continued to inflate, PSG paid it.
There is a very good reason City and almost every top team in Europe DON'T give their top players release clauses.
Sané's transfer would have been completely unaffected by a release clause, unless it was cheaper than what Bayern paid. Contracts will still run down with or without release clauses.
nobody is paying £500million for a player any day soon and not after covid-19 so until we sign haaland i will agree we are not on the same wavelength
as for sane the season long injury set the deal back but munich was never going to pay top dollar and city asking price
they knew the injury would lower his value and city will have to settle for a lower price. but it was a dirty trick by sane and his people and used the not happy in manchester card and why would you keep a unhappy player
Champions Again Ole Ole
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2018
- Messages
- 2,336
Just watching the build up to the game, he's so good
KennyG
Well-Known Member
Good for you, but it isn't about who you or I or anyone would rather have, thatbsets their value.
Given their age, injury records, whonthey play for, goals involved in, lentgh of contract etc etc, overall I just can't see on balance how kane is worth more than sterling.
Sterling benched. Been a peripheral figure lately. Do the maths.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.