Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mad 4 It said:
Yes I’d much prefer this. I hope we’re not trying to buy Kane as some sort of statement because in all likelihood it will rebound right back in City’s face
Click to expand...
Exactly, Spurs getting 100m for Kane is a get out of jail card, let them crash and burn.

Little Alf is the one we should break the bank for.
 
bhayes said:
Mahrez wasn't key for us winning the prem league, dias was. Never said he wasn't a good player, he is definitely above average but he is an individual and he can't play in a system as we have seen ever since his arrival, he still plays like he at lfc. He thrives at clubs like aston villa, or everton, where the mediocrity around him makes him shine like the star we thought he was.
Click to expand...
I'm tempted to report this post for wumming.

If you're not wumming then you're fucking clueless as Mahrez is one of our very best players.
 
If we cannot get Haaland, then we should sign Calvert Lewin for 50m, sell Sterling for 80m and sign Grealish for 90m. Sign Gosens for 40m and then replace like for like if any other senior player leaves. Total cost 100m and we are good to go.
 
applecentral said:
If we cannot get Haaland, then we should sign Calvert Lewin for 50m, sell Sterling for 80m and sign Grealish for 90m. Sign Gosens for 40m and then replace like for like if any other senior player leaves. Total cost 100m and we are good to go.
Click to expand...
Which version of FM are you using for your research?
 
The amount of shite our club takes because of our spending will never end , so why dont we really upset the media clowns and sign both Haaland and Grealish for £250m, quite sure we can cover some of those fees with the alleged "unhappy" players we have and players who are on the fringe of the first team.
No doubt UEFA will then be pressured into another FFP trial from the hateful eight and fatty Tebas , but why should we give a f*ck , we have given them all bloody noses in the past and we will again , even better if Halland signed for Mumbai City and then loaned him back to us and paid his wages , there would be piss boiling at unprecedented levels.
 
Read somewhere that City don't want to buy Haaland until after his 21st birthday which is towards the end of July.
Seemingly there is a new restriction on U21 foreign players and the most that can be signed is 3 at any given transfer window.
The 2 Fluminense lads have , or will sign in this transfer window.
City may be looking at maybe another U21 player
who they will want to sign along with Haaland.
I think the new ruling allows a premier team to be able to buy 3 more U21s in the January transfer window.
 
Xhavenjoe said:
Read somewhere that City don't want to buy Haaland until after his 21st birthday which is towards the end of July.
Seemingly there is a new restriction on U21 foreign players and the most that can be signed is 3 at any given transfer window.
The 2 Fluminense lads have , or will sign in this transfer window.
City may be looking at maybe another U21 player
who they will want to sign along with Haaland.
I think the new ruling allows a premier team to be able to buy 3 more U21s in the January transfer window.
Click to expand...
No way are we missing out on Haaland due to this. This move is probably the biggest transfer we could seen in the next 5 to 10 years at City
 
Mad 4 It said:
No way are we missing out on Haaland due to this. This move is probably the biggest transfer we could seen in the next 5 to 10 years at City
Click to expand...
I don't think well lose out.
I'm guessing they'll put in some arrangement where he doesn't officially sign until after that date.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top