Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought Dortmund have to release it when triggered due to the way the club is owned/ran or something(?) idk remember hearing it not sure how true it is
Dortmund is stock exchange listed and has to release an ad hoc announcement due to insider information as soon as the clause is triggered IMO (or the clubs have agreed on a deal).

Just checked that was the case on 1 July 2021 during EUROs when BvB and rags agreed on the Sancho deal for a fix €85m, without being a release clause.


Furthermore, Norwegian TV2 said the clause can be triggered before June, if true:
https://taketonews.com/report-haaland-clause-can-also-be-drawn-in-june/
 
Dont know why but I just think we wont trigger the release clause. We will end up paying more but we can structure the payment, it would give us some more goodwill as well perhaps with Dortmund for the future e.g. Bellingham.

80 odd million in structured payments and maybe one of our youngsters.
So,we won't activate the release clause, because we're a caring charity who want to give dortmund some extra cash.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So,we won't activate the release clause, because we're a caring charity who want to give dortmund some extra cash .
It's not because we are a charity but because we want to add some conditions P weay release clause pay the money end of. We want to vary the deal. So release clause is only an influencer.
 
So,we won't activate the release clause, because we're a caring charity who want to give dortmund some extra cash .
We trigger the release clause but agree with Dortmund how it’s paid it would help cashflow if the amount was spread over time instead of one payment Of course Dortmund would have to be “rewarded” to accept the deal by us paying more effectively an interest this would suit Dortmund as well The good will is built up with reasonable negotiation rather than being “billy big bollocks” slapping the cash on the table
 
every single german source have said multiple times the Adeyemi deal is in no way connected to Haaland, they wouldn't play in similar positions and dortmund are preparing to replace haaland with a different striker (that striker newcastle wanted in the winter from france was on the list)
It's like Spurs saying they want Vlahovic or Lautaro without anything to do with Kane. Adeyemi will be a direct replacement, he'd want guarantees else he would just go to Leipzig instead. They will obviously need another striker as well since Haaland's cover in Malen hasn't stepped up and could return to Eredivisie.
 
Clause or not 30th April seemed important to Dortmund for some reason and I wonder if we might hear something from them tomorrow.
 
We trigger the release clause but agree with Dortmund how it’s paid it would help cashflow if the amount was spread over time instead of one payment Of course Dortmund would have to be “rewarded” to accept the deal by us paying more effectively an interest this would suit Dortmund as well The good will is built up with reasonable negotiation rather than being “billy big bollocks” slapping the cash on the table
Interesting if we are structuring the release clause fee over a longer period. We can’t be short of a few quid, so it could point to another big signing.
 
It's like Spurs saying they want Vlahovic or Lautaro without anything to do with Kane. Adeyemi will be a direct replacement, he'd want guarantees else he would just go to Leipzig instead. They will obviously need another striker as well since Haaland's cover in Malen hasn't stepped up and could return to Eredivisie.
It's nothing like that because Kane didn't have a clause and haaland does
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top